NFLP vs. CRAK
NFLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFLP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while CRAK is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. NFLP is actively managed, while CRAK is passively managed. Over the past year, NFLP returned -46.94% vs 42.08% for CRAK. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.
Performance
NFLP vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLP achieves a -28.54% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 20.86% return.
NFLP
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -20.07%
- YTD
- -28.54%
- 6M
- -27.91%
- 1Y
- -46.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRAK
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 20.73%
- 1Y
- 42.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
NFLP vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF | -28.54% | -1.54% | 53.24% | 13.91% |
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 20.86% | 39.11% | -15.05% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLP and CRAK is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | 0.09 |
The correlation between NFLP and CRAK shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLP vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank
NFLP
CRAK
NFLP vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLP | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 1.37 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 3.29 | -4.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.77 | 11.53 | -13.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLP vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLP drawdown since its inception was -49.06%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLP and CRAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLP | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.06% | -58.80% | +9.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.06% | -12.84% | -36.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.00% | -12.74% | -36.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.39% | -12.47% | +2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.47% | 3.66% | +22.81% |
Volatility
NFLP vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) has a higher volatility of 8.84% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 6.42%. This indicates that NFLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLP | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.84% | 6.42% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.84% | 15.00% | +12.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.23% | 19.11% | +15.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.07% | 20.67% | +8.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.07% | 22.17% | +6.90% |
NFLP vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLP vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison
NFLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.68%, more than CRAK's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 1.67% | 2.02% | 5.60% | 3.65% | 3.08% | 2.40% | 2.64% | 1.49% | 2.42% | 1.66% | 3.42% | 0.47% |
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF | 29.68% | 26.56% | 19.87% | 3.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLP and CRAK have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLP has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to CRAK (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLP dropped -49.06% vs CRAK's -58.80%.
On 1-year performance, CRAK leads with 42.08% vs -46.94% for NFLP. On fees, CRAK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 42.08% return vs -46.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRAK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLP.
NFLP has the higher dividend yield at 29.68%, compared with 1.67% for CRAK.
NFLP is categorized as Derivative Income, while CRAK is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLP and 0.62% for CRAK.
CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLP and CRAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer