NFLP vs. ARMW
NFLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
NFLP vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLP achieves a -18.61% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 363.23% return.
NFLP
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- -18.61%
- 6M
- -25.81%
- 1Y
- -37.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- 128.75%
- YTD
- 363.23%
- 6M
- 245.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLP vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF | -18.61% | -14.17% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 363.23% | -40.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLP and ARMW is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLP vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank
NFLP
ARMW
NFLP vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFLP | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLP | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 4.96 | -4.48 |
Drawdowns
NFLP vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLP drawdown since its inception was -43.48%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLP and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLP | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.48% | -48.47% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.92% | 0.00% | -41.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.73% | -26.55% | +16.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.52% | — | — |
Volatility
NFLP vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLP | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.37% | 88.46% | -55.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 88.46% | -59.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 88.46% | -59.58% |
NFLP vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NFLP and ARMW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
NFLP vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
NFLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.06%, more than ARMW's 15.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 15.20% | 16.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF | 26.06% | 26.56% | 19.87% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLP and ARMW have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NFLP and ARMW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
NFLP has the higher dividend yield at 26.06%, compared with 15.20% for ARMW.
They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Roundhill Investments.
Find the right allocation for NFLP and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer