PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLP vs. AIRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLP vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLP achieves a -27.75% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 24.22% return.


NFLP

1D
0.94%
1M
-3.13%
6M
-14.10%
YTD
-27.75%
1Y
-39.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.12%

AIRR

1D
-0.49%
1M
-3.87%
6M
7.53%
YTD
24.22%
1Y
38.88%
3Y*
31.68%
5Y*
24.17%
10Y*
20.35%
ALL TIME*
15.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$90.35M$87.77M$90.71M
$58.87K$70.72K$78.98K

NFLP vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NFLP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF
-27.75%-1.54%53.24%13.91%
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
24.22%27.92%33.45%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLP and AIRR is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.12

The correlation between NFLP and AIRR shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLP vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NFLP
NFLP Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLP Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLP Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NFLP vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLPAIRRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.24

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

2.27

-3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

8.52

-9.94

NFLP vs. AIRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLP Sharpe Ratio is -1.12, which is lower than the AIRR Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLP and AIRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLP vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLP drawdown since its inception was -53.43%, which is greater than AIRR's maximum drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLP and AIRR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLPAIRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.43%

-42.37%

-11.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.83%

-17.18%

-33.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.44%

-8.40%

-40.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.07%

-7.47%

-4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.16%

4.57%

+23.59%

Volatility

NFLP vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) has a higher volatility of 10.83% compared to First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) at 9.94%. This indicates that NFLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLPAIRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.83%

9.94%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.08%

22.27%

+7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.85%

28.13%

+7.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.67%

25.74%

+3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.67%

26.49%

+3.18%

NFLP vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFLP vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

NFLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.22%, more than AIRR's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.09%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
NFLP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF
27.22%26.56%19.87%3.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLP and AIRR have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFLP has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to AIRR (9.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLP dropped -53.43% vs AIRR's -42.37%.

On 1-year performance, AIRR leads with 38.88% vs -39.95% for NFLP. On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, AIRR has been the lower-risk option at 9.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 38.88% return vs -39.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIRR is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLP.

NFLP has the higher dividend yield at 27.22%, compared with 0.09% for AIRR.

NFLP is categorized as Derivative Income, while AIRR is Building & Construction. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLP and 0.69% for AIRR.

AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLP and AIRR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer