PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFJ vs. CDDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFJ vs. CDDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund (NFJ) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFJ achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly higher than CDDYX's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, NFJ has underperformed CDDYX with an annualized return of 10.39%, while CDDYX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.


NFJ

1D
-0.53%
1M
5.12%
YTD
19.07%
6M
20.29%
1Y
35.91%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
10.39%

CDDYX

1D
0.94%
1M
1.47%
YTD
8.15%
6M
8.50%
1Y
20.48%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFJ vs. CDDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFJ
Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund
19.07%12.40%9.96%21.30%-23.90%26.75%12.42%30.88%-11.97%12.74%
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
8.15%15.95%15.17%10.65%-4.84%26.43%7.92%28.74%-4.27%20.34%

Correlation

The correlation between NFJ and CDDYX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2012

0.69

The correlation between NFJ and CDDYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFJ vs. CDDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFJ
NFJ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NFJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NFJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CDDYX
CDDYX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CDDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CDDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFJ vs. CDDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund (NFJ) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NFJCDDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.41

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

3.83

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.38

14.44

-0.05

NFJ vs. CDDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the CDDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFJ and CDDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NFJCDDYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

2.33

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.82

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.81

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.88

-0.57

Drawdowns

NFJ vs. CDDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFJ drawdown since its inception was -57.92%, which is greater than CDDYX's maximum drawdown of -32.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFJ and CDDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFJCDDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.92%

-32.74%

-25.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-5.51%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.04%

-12.99%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.57%

-16.91%

-13.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.96%

-32.74%

-8.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.30%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.79%

-2.77%

-8.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

1.46%

+1.04%

Volatility

NFJ vs. CDDYX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund (NFJ) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) at 2.48%. This indicates that NFJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFJCDDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

2.48%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

6.87%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

9.07%

+3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

13.27%

+3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

15.69%

+2.96%

NFJ vs. CDDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFJ has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than CDDYX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFJ vs. CDDYX - Dividend Comparison

NFJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, more than CDDYX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
4.97%5.33%5.99%4.96%3.90%2.93%1.85%3.28%7.65%4.03%3.84%8.35%
NFJ
Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund
8.14%9.46%9.26%7.78%8.83%5.60%6.69%6.92%8.43%8.62%9.52%13.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFJ and CDDYX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFJ has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to CDDYX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFJ dropped -57.92% vs CDDYX's -32.74%.

NFJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFJ and CDDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer