NFJ vs. AFNIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NFJ (Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund) and AFNIX (AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - NFJ is a Dividend fund managed by Virtus, while AFNIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by AAM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NFJ charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for AFNIX.

Performance

NFJ vs. AFNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund (NFJ) and AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NFJ

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 5.12%
• YTD: 19.07%
• 6M: 20.29%
• 1Y: 35.91%
• 3Y*: 18.50%
• 5Y*: 9.17%
• 10Y*: 10.39%

AFNIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFJ vs. AFNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NFJ Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund	19.07%	12.40%	9.96%	21.30%	-23.90%	26.75%	12.42%	30.88%	-11.97%	12.74%
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I	1.74%	11.36%	16.23%	6.59%	-8.77%	25.23%	6.60%	25.71%	-1.98%	19.51%

Correlation

The correlation between NFJ and AFNIX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between NFJ and AFNIX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NFJ vs. AFNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFJ

NFJ Risk / Return Rank: 81
NFJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
NFJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
NFJ Omega Ratio Rank: 74
NFJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NFJ Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFJ vs. AFNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund (NFJ) and AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NFJ	AFNIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.97	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.21	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.38	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NFJ	AFNIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	NFJ	AFNIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.79%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NFJ	AFNIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.01%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.00%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.13%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.65%	—	—

NFJ vs. AFNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFJ has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than AFNIX's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFJ vs. AFNIX - Dividend Comparison

NFJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, less than AFNIX's 31.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I	31.18%	14.13%	6.88%	3.43%	4.61%	1.78%	1.75%	2.13%	2.04%	1.72%	1.79%	2.66%
NFJ Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund	8.14%	9.46%	9.26%	7.78%	8.83%	5.60%	6.69%	6.92%	8.43%	8.62%	9.52%	13.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFJ and AFNIX in my portfolio?

NFJ and AFNIX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.