NFIAX vs. EIFAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NFIAX (Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund) and EIFAX (Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 10 years, NFIAX returned 4.51%/yr vs 5.05%/yr for EIFAX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NFIAX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for EIFAX.

Performance

NFIAX vs. EIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund (NFIAX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFIAX achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than EIFAX's 0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, NFIAX has underperformed EIFAX with an annualized return of 4.51%, while EIFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.05% annualized return.

NFIAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 1.37%
• 6M: 1.81%
• 1Y: 5.28%
• 3Y*: 7.85%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 4.51%

EIFAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 0.69%
• 6M: 0.76%
• 1Y: 3.60%
• 3Y*: 7.26%
• 5Y*: 4.94%
• 10Y*: 5.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFIAX vs. EIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NFIAX Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund	1.37%	5.83%	8.89%	10.92%	-3.26%	4.27%	3.63%	8.31%	-1.13%	3.19%
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund	0.69%	4.54%	8.91%	11.86%	-2.98%	5.41%	1.90%	9.02%	0.28%	5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between NFIAX and EIFAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2009	0.69

The correlation between NFIAX and EIFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NFIAX vs. EIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFIAX

NFIAX Risk / Return Rank: 89
NFIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
NFIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
NFIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
NFIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
NFIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

EIFAX

EIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 36
EIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
EIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
EIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
EIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
EIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFIAX vs. EIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund (NFIAX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NFIAX	EIFAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	1.45	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.22	3.09	+3.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.00	1.44	+0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.97	1.63	+3.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.07	4.92	+12.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NFIAX vs. EIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the EIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFIAX and EIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NFIAX	EIFAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	1.45	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.88	1.58	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.13	1.14	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	1.20	+0.05

Drawdowns

NFIAX vs. EIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFIAX drawdown since its inception was -22.18%, smaller than the maximum EIFAX drawdown of -40.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFIAX and EIFAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFIAX	EIFAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.18%	-40.28%	+18.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.07%	-2.29%	+1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.19%	-3.43%	+1.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.84%	-7.63%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.18%	-24.22%	+2.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	0.00%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-2.27%	+1.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	0.76%	-0.45%

Volatility

NFIAX vs. EIFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund (NFIAX) is 0.59%, while Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) has a volatility of 0.64%. This indicates that NFIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFIAX	EIFAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.59%	0.64%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.57%	1.96%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19%	2.57%	-0.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.69%	3.14%	-0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.02%	4.45%	-0.43%

NFIAX vs. EIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFIAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than EIFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFIAX vs. EIFAX - Dividend Comparison

NFIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, less than EIFAX's 7.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund	7.61%	8.09%	8.91%	7.02%	5.92%	4.03%	4.51%	5.58%	5.10%	4.46%	5.02%	5.29%
NFIAX Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund	6.59%	6.84%	8.05%	6.89%	3.97%	3.36%	3.68%	4.71%	4.32%	3.44%	3.46%	4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFIAX and EIFAX in my portfolio?

NFIAX and EIFAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFIAX or EIFAX?

EIFAX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to NFIAX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFIAX dropped -22.18% vs EIFAX's -40.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NFIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.