PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFEPX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFEPX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Large Cap Growth Opportunity Fund (NFEPX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFEPX achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 4.22% return.


NFEPX

1D
-0.04%
1M
-3.55%
6M
8.03%
YTD
8.03%
1Y
19.74%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
15.69%

FSPGX

1D
-1.05%
1M
-4.04%
6M
4.22%
YTD
4.22%
1Y
16.71%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFEPX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFEPX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opportunity Fund
8.03%15.54%24.80%31.61%-29.54%20.42%40.86%36.35%-4.14%27.96%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
4.22%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between NFEPX and FSPGX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.97

The correlation between NFEPX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFEPX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFEPX
NFEPX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NFEPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFEPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFEPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
NFEPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFEPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFEPX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Growth Opportunity Fund (NFEPX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFEPXFSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.19

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.10

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.38

3.52

+0.86

NFEPX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFEPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFEPX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFEPX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFEPX drawdown since its inception was -53.78%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFEPX and FSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFEPXFSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.78%

-32.66%

-21.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.01%

-16.17%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.49%

-23.32%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.26%

-32.66%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-4.40%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.41%

-6.36%

-7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

5.03%

-0.33%

Volatility

NFEPX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Large Cap Growth Opportunity Fund (NFEPX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) have volatilities of 6.94% and 6.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFEPXFSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

6.94%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

13.04%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.98%

16.52%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.73%

21.68%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.49%

21.57%

-0.08%

NFEPX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFEPX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFEPX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

NFEPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than FSPGX's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.37%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%0.00%0.00%
NFEPX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opportunity Fund
5.81%5.08%2.94%0.00%19.87%37.27%11.00%8.94%11.47%5.79%12.73%21.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, NFEPX and FSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSPGX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to NFEPX (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFEPX dropped -53.78% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

NFEPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFEPX and FSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer