NEXI.MI vs. FHKCX
NEXI.MI (Nexi S.p.A) is a stock, while FHKCX (Fidelity China Region Fund) is China Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, NEXI.MI returned -25.25%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for FHKCX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NEXI.MI vs. FHKCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NEXI.MI is traded in EUR, while FHKCX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FHKCX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEXI.MI achieves a -13.06% return, which is significantly lower than FHKCX's 32.19% return.
NEXI.MI
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -11.85%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -8.09%
- 1Y
- -30.63%
- 3Y*
- -19.36%
- 5Y*
- -25.25%
- 10Y*
- —
FHKCX
- 1D
- -5.17%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- 32.19%
- 6M
- 31.75%
- 1Y
- 66.79%
- 3Y*
- 27.25%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 14.18%
NEXI.MI vs. FHKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEXI.MI Nexi S.p.A | -13.06% | -17.39% | -27.63% | 0.54% | -47.35% | -14.38% | 31.99% | 46.68% |
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 32.19% | 25.65% | 31.28% | -3.28% | -19.15% | -7.23% | 35.66% | 10.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEXI.MI and FHKCX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEXI.MI vs. FHKCX — Risk / Return Rank
NEXI.MI
FHKCX
NEXI.MI vs. FHKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nexi S.p.A (NEXI.MI) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NEXI.MI | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.55 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 7.95 | -8.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 21.72 | -22.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEXI.MI | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | 3.19 | -4.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 | 0.37 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.28 | 0.43 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
NEXI.MI vs. FHKCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEXI.MI drawdown since its inception was -84.94%, which is greater than FHKCX's maximum drawdown of -56.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEXI.MI and FHKCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEXI.MI | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.94% | -56.01% | -28.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.59% | -8.57% | -42.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.90% | -23.70% | -39.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.94% | -42.63% | -42.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.16% | -6.45% | -73.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.23% | -18.11% | -26.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.90% | 3.13% | +24.77% |
Volatility
NEXI.MI vs. FHKCX - Volatility Comparison
Nexi S.p.A (NEXI.MI) has a higher volatility of 10.76% compared to Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) at 8.55%. This indicates that NEXI.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEXI.MI | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.76% | 8.55% | +2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.26% | 16.58% | +13.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.32% | 21.35% | +14.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.77% | 23.13% | +12.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.38% | 21.88% | +15.50% |
Dividends
NEXI.MI vs. FHKCX - Dividend Comparison
NEXI.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, more than FHKCX's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 1.35% | 1.75% | 1.39% | 1.92% | 1.05% | 10.77% | 4.85% | 0.66% | 0.83% | 0.39% | 1.35% | 15.47% |
NEXI.MI Nexi S.p.A | 8.90% | 5.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEXI.MI and FHKCX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NEXI.MI and FHKCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer