PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEWZ vs. LST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEWZ vs. LST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) and Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEWZ achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly lower than LST's 14.59% return.


NEWZ

1D
-2.67%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
5.84%
6M
4.50%
1Y
1.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LST

1D
-2.63%
1M
3.63%
YTD
14.59%
6M
15.54%
1Y
31.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEWZ vs. LST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NEWZ and LST is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025

0.80

The correlation between NEWZ and LST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEWZ vs. LST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEWZ
NEWZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
NEWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
NEWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

LST
LST Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LST Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LST Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
LST Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEWZ vs. LST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) and Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEWZLSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.39

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

3.00

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.51

12.41

-11.89

NEWZ vs. LST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEWZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the LST Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEWZ and LST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEWZLSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

2.23

-2.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

1.27

-0.79

Drawdowns

NEWZ vs. LST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEWZ drawdown since its inception was -19.40%, roughly equal to the maximum LST drawdown of -19.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEWZ and LST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEWZLSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.40%

-19.47%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.82%

-10.85%

+0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.85%

-2.63%

-2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-2.91%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

2.61%

+1.26%

Volatility

NEWZ vs. LST - Volatility Comparison

StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) and Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST) have volatilities of 4.80% and 4.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEWZLSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

4.82%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

12.06%

-2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

14.60%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

18.04%

-2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.81%

18.04%

-2.23%

NEWZ vs. LST - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEWZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LST's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEWZ vs. LST - Dividend Comparison

NEWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than LST's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
LST
Leuthold Select Industries ETF
1.17%1.34%0.00%
NEWZ
StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF
0.11%0.27%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEWZ and LST have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LST has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to NEWZ (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEWZ dropped -19.40% vs LST's -19.47%.

On 1-year performance, LST leads with 31.04% vs 1.35% for NEWZ. On fees, LST is cheaper at 0.65% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LST has performed better with a 31.04% return vs 1.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LST is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NEWZ.

LST has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.11% for NEWZ.

They also come from different issuers: StockSnips and Leuthold Group. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NEWZ and 0.65% for LST.

LST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEWZ and LST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer