PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEWZ vs. BILZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEWZ vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEWZ achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly higher than BILZ's 1.66% return.


NEWZ

1D
-1.19%
1M
1.04%
YTD
7.09%
6M
5.45%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BILZ

1D
0.01%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.66%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEWZ vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NEWZ and BILZ is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEWZ vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEWZ
NEWZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NEWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
NEWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BILZ
BILZ Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEWZ vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEWZBILZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-18.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-118.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

47.37

-46.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

197.18

-196.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

1,895.58

-1,894.42

NEWZ vs. BILZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEWZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the BILZ Sharpe Ratio of 18.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEWZ and BILZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEWZ vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEWZ drawdown since its inception was -19.40%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEWZ and BILZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEWZBILZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.40%

-0.52%

-18.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.82%

-0.02%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

0.00%

-3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-0.01%

-5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

0.00%

+3.88%

Volatility

NEWZ vs. BILZ - Volatility Comparison

StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) at 0.07%. This indicates that NEWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEWZBILZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

0.07%

+5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.50%

0.14%

+9.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

0.21%

+14.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.84%

0.52%

+15.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.84%

0.52%

+15.32%

NEWZ vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEWZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEWZ vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison

NEWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than BILZ's 4.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BILZ
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund
4.06%4.19%4.95%2.23%
NEWZ
StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF
0.11%0.27%0.18%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEWZ and BILZ have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEWZ has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to BILZ (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEWZ dropped -19.40% vs BILZ's -0.52%.

On 1-year performance, NEWZ leads with 4.49% vs 3.88% for BILZ. On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BILZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NEWZ has performed better with a 4.49% return vs 3.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NEWZ.

BILZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.06%, compared with 0.11% for NEWZ.

NEWZ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while BILZ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: StockSnips and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NEWZ and 0.14% for BILZ.

BILZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.68 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEWZ and BILZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer