NESGX vs. QISGX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NESGX (Needham Small Cap Growth Fund) and QISGX (Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NESGX returned 19.69%/yr vs 13.56%/yr for QISGX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NESGX charges 1.85%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QISGX.

Performance

NESGX vs. QISGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NESGX achieves a 74.77% return, which is significantly higher than QISGX's 18.33% return. Over the past 10 years, NESGX has outperformed QISGX with an annualized return of 19.69%, while QISGX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.56% annualized return.

NESGX

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: 18.07%
• YTD: 74.77%
• 6M: 77.64%
• 1Y: 122.24%
• 3Y*: 31.38%
• 5Y*: 9.34%
• 10Y*: 19.69%

QISGX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 4.46%
• YTD: 18.33%
• 6M: 20.08%
• 1Y: 45.84%
• 3Y*: 20.95%
• 5Y*: 8.92%
• 10Y*: 13.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NESGX vs. QISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund	74.77%	10.50%	12.76%	5.68%	-30.21%	10.59%	71.90%	54.42%	-5.43%	11.96%
QISGX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund	18.33%	17.72%	15.63%	19.63%	-27.94%	18.14%	29.91%	21.14%	-6.33%	25.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NESGX and QISGX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between NESGX and QISGX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NESGX vs. QISGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NESGX

NESGX Risk / Return Rank: 94
NESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
NESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
NESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
NESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

QISGX

QISGX Risk / Return Rank: 66
QISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
QISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
QISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
QISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NESGX vs. QISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NESGX	QISGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.11	2.28	+1.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.49	3.24	+1.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.44	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.96	3.56	+3.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	28.90	13.36	+15.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NESGX vs. QISGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NESGX Sharpe Ratio is 4.11, which is higher than the QISGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NESGX and QISGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NESGX	QISGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.11	2.28	+1.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.37	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.55	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.40	+0.21

Drawdowns

NESGX vs. QISGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NESGX drawdown since its inception was -50.29%, smaller than the maximum QISGX drawdown of -60.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NESGX and QISGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NESGX	QISGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.29%	-60.75%	+10.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.16%	-13.23%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.27%	-27.28%	-7.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.05%	-38.60%	-11.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.29%	-45.08%	-5.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.84%	+0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.66%	-13.89%	+2.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.13%	3.53%	+0.60%

Volatility

NESGX vs. QISGX - Volatility Comparison

Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX) at 6.06%. This indicates that NESGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NESGX	QISGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.14%	6.06%	+2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.82%	15.94%	+4.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.08%	20.53%	+9.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.22%	24.48%	+4.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.80%	24.69%	+1.11%

NESGX vs. QISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NESGX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QISGX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

NESGX vs. QISGX - Dividend Comparison

NESGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QISGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.16%	25.09%	13.69%	8.43%	22.26%	8.94%	6.67%	2.52%
QISGX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund	3.31%	3.91%	0.00%	0.05%	3.63%	29.34%	0.45%	0.00%	7.03%	5.09%	1.61%	18.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NESGX and QISGX in my portfolio?

NESGX and QISGX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NESGX or QISGX?

NESGX has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to QISGX (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NESGX dropped -50.29% vs QISGX's -60.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.