NESGX vs. CMCIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NESGX (Needham Small Cap Growth Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, NESGX returned 122.24% vs 0.07% for CMCIX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NESGX charges 1.85%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.

Performance

NESGX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NESGX achieves a 74.77% return, which is significantly higher than CMCIX's 1.72% return.

NESGX

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: 18.07%
• YTD: 74.77%
• 6M: 77.64%
• 1Y: 122.24%
• 3Y*: 31.38%
• 5Y*: 9.34%
• 10Y*: 19.69%

CMCIX

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: 1.56%
• 1Y: 0.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NESGX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund	74.77%	10.50%	12.76%	16.58%
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I	1.72%	-5.28%	10.46%	7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NESGX and CMCIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023	0.71

The correlation between NESGX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NESGX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NESGX

NESGX Risk / Return Rank: 94
NESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
NESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
NESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
NESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

CMCIX

CMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
CMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NESGX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NESGX	CMCIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.11	-0.02	+4.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.49	0.08	+4.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.01	+0.58
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.96	-0.04	+6.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	28.90	-0.09	+28.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NESGX vs. CMCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NESGX Sharpe Ratio is 4.11, which is higher than the CMCIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NESGX and CMCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NESGX	CMCIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.11	-0.02	+4.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.32	+0.29

Drawdowns

NESGX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NESGX drawdown since its inception was -50.29%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NESGX and CMCIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NESGX	CMCIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.29%	-21.50%	-28.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.16%	-11.68%	-5.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-10.79%	+10.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.66%	-6.44%	-5.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.13%	4.98%	-0.85%

Volatility

NESGX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison

Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.89%. This indicates that NESGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NESGX	CMCIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.14%	3.89%	+4.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.82%	10.55%	+10.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.08%	15.16%	+14.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.22%	16.55%	+12.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.80%	16.55%	+9.25%

NESGX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NESGX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

NESGX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison

NESGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I	4.18%	4.25%	7.13%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.16%	25.09%	13.69%	8.43%	22.26%	8.94%	6.67%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NESGX and CMCIX in my portfolio?

NESGX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NESGX or CMCIX?

NESGX has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to CMCIX (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NESGX dropped -50.29% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.