NEON vs. GLDM
NEON (Neonode Inc.) is a stock, while GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Over the past 5 years, NEON returned -32.42%/yr vs 16.85%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NEON vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEON achieves a -52.61% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's -7.26% return.
NEON
- 1D
- -7.60%
- 1M
- -30.71%
- 6M
- -57.05%
- YTD
- -52.61%
- 1Y
- -96.77%
- 3Y*
- -41.74%
- 5Y*
- -32.42%
- 10Y*
- -25.23%
GLDM
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- 6M
- -12.90%
- YTD
- -7.26%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- 26.87%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- —
NEON vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEON Neonode Inc. | -52.61% | -78.86% | 259.39% | -58.36% | -37.85% | 31.11% | 247.94% | 16.87% | -52.57% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -7.26% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEON and GLDM is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEON vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
NEON
GLDM
NEON vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neonode Inc. (NEON) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEON | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.59 | 1.15 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 0.73 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 1.80 | -2.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEON vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEON drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -26.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEON and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEON | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.95% | -26.11% | -73.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.20% | -26.11% | -71.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.20% | -26.11% | -71.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.20% | -26.11% | -71.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.95% | -25.85% | -74.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.76% | -6.43% | -90.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 85.84% | 10.63% | +75.21% |
Volatility
NEON vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
Neonode Inc. (NEON) has a higher volatility of 26.89% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 7.60%. This indicates that NEON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEON | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.89% | 7.60% | +19.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.33% | 24.04% | +34.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.63% | 27.76% | +77.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.11% | 18.30% | +90.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 99.54% | 17.07% | +82.47% |
Dividends
NEON vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
Neither NEON nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NEON and GLDM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEON has higher volatility (26.89%) compared to GLDM (7.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEON dropped -99.95% vs GLDM's -26.11%.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEON and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer