PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEO (NEO-USD) and Monero (XMR-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEO-USD
NEO
-22.80%-74.14%-2.90%127.45%-76.07%79.57%64.24%13.60%-89.78%51,706.44%
XMR-USD
Monero
-21.79%124.37%16.94%12.32%-35.78%46.22%252.56%-2.31%-86.51%2,339.73%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NEO-USD having a -22.80% return and XMR-USD slightly higher at -21.79%.


NEO-USD

1D
0.42%
1M
1.08%
YTD
-22.80%
6M
-55.45%
1Y
-50.79%
3Y*
-39.30%
5Y*
-44.84%
10Y*

XMR-USD

1D
1.36%
1M
-2.42%
YTD
-21.79%
6M
8.37%
1Y
56.43%
3Y*
28.36%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
71.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEO-USD
NEO-USD Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NEO-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEO-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEO-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
NEO-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEO-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

XMR-USD
XMR-USD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
XMR-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMR-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMR-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XMR-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMR-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEO (NEO-USD) and Monero (XMR-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEO-USDXMR-USDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.62

0.72

-1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.62

1.38

-2.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.16

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.07

0.20

-1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.63

0.42

-2.05

NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEO-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the XMR-USD Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEO-USD and XMR-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEO-USDXMR-USDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.62

0.72

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

0.07

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.49

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between NEO-USD and XMR-USD is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEO-USD drawdown since its inception was -98.70%, roughly equal to the maximum XMR-USD drawdown of -95.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEO-USD and XMR-USD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NEO-USDXMR-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.70%

-95.68%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.29%

-58.97%

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.99%

-78.49%

-19.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.57%

-52.37%

-46.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.74%

-62.76%

-20.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.69%

27.89%

+16.80%

Volatility

NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD - Volatility Comparison

NEO (NEO-USD) has a higher volatility of 21.30% compared to Monero (XMR-USD) at 15.43%. This indicates that NEO-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMR-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NEO-USDXMR-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.30%

15.43%

+5.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.41%

67.75%

-5.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.61%

65.55%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.97%

67.36%

+16.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

115.13%

87.89%

+27.24%