PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEO (NEO-USD) and Monero (XMR-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEO-USD achieves a -41.31% return, which is significantly lower than XMR-USD's -26.92% return.


NEO-USD

1D
-2.79%
1M
-26.93%
YTD
-41.31%
6M
-42.54%
1Y
-63.13%
3Y*
-39.13%
5Y*
-43.24%
10Y*

XMR-USD

1D
-0.16%
1M
-19.36%
YTD
-26.92%
6M
-29.29%
1Y
1.44%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
70.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEO-USD
NEO
-41.31%-74.14%-2.90%127.45%-76.07%79.57%64.24%13.60%-89.78%51,706.44%
XMR-USD
Monero
-26.92%124.37%16.94%12.32%-35.78%46.22%252.56%-2.31%-86.51%2,339.73%

Correlation

The correlation between NEO-USD and XMR-USD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between NEO-USD and XMR-USD has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEO-USD
NEO-USD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
NEO-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEO-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEO-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NEO-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEO-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

XMR-USD
XMR-USD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
XMR-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMR-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMR-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XMR-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMR-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEO (NEO-USD) and Monero (XMR-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEO-USDXMR-USDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.07

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

0.02

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

0.04

-1.34

NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEO-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the XMR-USD Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEO-USD and XMR-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEO-USD drawdown since its inception was -98.91%, roughly equal to the maximum XMR-USD drawdown of -95.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEO-USD and XMR-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEO-USDXMR-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.91%

-95.68%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.50%

-58.97%

-14.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.08%

-58.97%

-33.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.87%

-67.28%

-29.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.91%

-55.50%

-43.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.06%

-62.51%

-21.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.93%

38.91%

+5.02%

Volatility

NEO-USD vs. XMR-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEO (NEO-USD) is 14.30%, while Monero (XMR-USD) has a volatility of 36.45%. This indicates that NEO-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMR-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEO-USDXMR-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.30%

36.45%

-22.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.28%

68.94%

-22.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.91%

69.35%

-6.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.89%

61.59%

+15.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

126.58%

87.57%

+39.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEO-USD and XMR-USD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMR-USD has higher volatility (36.45%) compared to NEO-USD (14.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEO-USD dropped -98.91% vs XMR-USD's -95.68%.

XMR-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEO-USD and XMR-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer