PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEO-USD vs. ZEC-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NEO-USD vs. ZEC-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEO (NEO-USD) and ZCash (ZEC-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NEO-USD vs. ZEC-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEO-USD
NEO
-22.80%-74.14%-2.90%127.45%-76.07%79.57%64.24%13.60%-89.78%51,706.44%
ZEC-USD
ZCash
-50.42%808.40%108.73%-27.69%-74.58%128.45%132.06%-51.14%-88.81%951.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEO-USD achieves a -22.80% return, which is significantly higher than ZEC-USD's -50.42% return.


NEO-USD

1D
0.42%
1M
1.08%
YTD
-22.80%
6M
-55.45%
1Y
-50.79%
3Y*
-39.30%
5Y*
-44.84%
10Y*

ZEC-USD

1D
1.95%
1M
12.93%
YTD
-50.42%
6M
109.50%
1Y
515.47%
3Y*
90.72%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEO-USD vs. ZEC-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEO-USD
NEO-USD Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NEO-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEO-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEO-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
NEO-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEO-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

ZEC-USD
ZEC-USD Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ZEC-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEC-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEC-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEC-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEC-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEO-USD vs. ZEC-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEO (NEO-USD) and ZCash (ZEC-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEO-USDZEC-USDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.62

3.50

-4.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.62

3.63

-4.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.36

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.07

17.83

-18.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.63

32.68

-34.31

NEO-USD vs. ZEC-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEO-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the ZEC-USD Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEO-USD and ZEC-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEO-USDZEC-USDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.62

3.50

-4.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

0.07

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.17

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between NEO-USD and ZEC-USD is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

NEO-USD vs. ZEC-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEO-USD drawdown since its inception was -98.70%, roughly equal to the maximum ZEC-USD drawdown of -97.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEO-USD and ZEC-USD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NEO-USDZEC-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.70%

-97.92%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.29%

-71.77%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.99%

-94.28%

-3.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.57%

-71.27%

-27.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.74%

-81.63%

-2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.69%

39.17%

+5.52%

Volatility

NEO-USD vs. ZEC-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEO (NEO-USD) is 21.30%, while ZCash (ZEC-USD) has a volatility of 34.30%. This indicates that NEO-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEC-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NEO-USDZEC-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.30%

34.30%

-13.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.41%

114.46%

-52.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.61%

122.45%

-54.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.97%

93.26%

-9.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

115.13%

97.17%

+17.96%