NEMIX vs. HLFMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

NEMIX (Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and HLFMX (Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NEMIX returned 7.08%/yr vs 4.34%/yr for HLFMX. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NEMIX charges 1.23%/yr vs 1.60%/yr for HLFMX.

Performance

NEMIX vs. HLFMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund (NEMIX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEMIX achieves a 8.68% return, which is significantly higher than HLFMX's 6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, NEMIX has outperformed HLFMX with an annualized return of 7.08%, while HLFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.34% annualized return.

NEMIX

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: 5.84%
• 6M: 0.91%
• YTD: 8.68%
• 1Y: 25.47%
• 3Y*: 17.25%
• 5Y*: 4.98%
• 10Y*: 7.08%
• ALL TIME*: 7.29%

HLFMX

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: -2.06%
• YTD: 6.49%
• 1Y: 12.21%
• 3Y*: 10.91%
• 5Y*: 5.18%
• 10Y*: 4.34%
• ALL TIME*: 1.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HLFMX Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NEMIX Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

NEMIX vs. HLFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NEMIX Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund	8.68%	35.31%	12.87%	4.68%	-23.86%	-3.32%	13.31%	18.98%	-17.32%	41.62%
HLFMX Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund	6.49%	16.95%	8.76%	10.43%	-18.91%	10.18%	0.11%	10.88%	-15.45%	25.08%

Correlation

The correlation between NEMIX and HLFMX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2008	0.63

The correlation between NEMIX and HLFMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NEMIX vs. HLFMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NEMIX

NEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
NEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
NEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
NEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
NEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

HLFMX

HLFMX Risk / Return Rank: 27
HLFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
HLFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
HLFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
HLFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
HLFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NEMIX vs. HLFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund (NEMIX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NEMIX	HLFMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	0.96	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	1.52	+0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.19	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	1.07	+0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.46	2.64	+1.82

NEMIX vs. HLFMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the HLFMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEMIX and HLFMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NEMIX vs. HLFMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMIX drawdown since its inception was -41.28%, smaller than the maximum HLFMX drawdown of -63.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMIX and HLFMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEMIX	HLFMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.28%	-63.95%	+22.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.92%	-11.09%	-0.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.42%	-11.79%	-1.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.58%	-28.37%	-7.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.28%	-46.61%	+5.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.89%	-3.26%	-1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.11%	-19.13%	+5.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.11%	4.49%	+0.62%

Volatility

NEMIX vs. HLFMX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund (NEMIX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) have volatilities of 3.59% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NEMIX	HLFMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	3.50%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.37%	11.02%	+0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.68%	12.39%	+2.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.87%	10.67%	+5.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.74%	11.95%	+4.79%

NEMIX vs. HLFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEMIX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than HLFMX's 1.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

NEMIX vs. HLFMX - Dividend Comparison

NEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than HLFMX's 3.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HLFMX Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund	3.35%	3.56%	1.88%	1.77%	2.28%	0.83%	1.61%	1.97%	1.34%	1.90%	1.01%	1.13%
NEMIX Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Equity Fund	0.02%	0.02%	0.14%	1.34%	0.44%	1.06%	0.36%	1.80%	1.00%	0.63%	0.52%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEMIX and HLFMX in my portfolio?

NEMIX and HLFMX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NEMIX or HLFMX?

NEMIX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to HLFMX (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEMIX dropped -41.28% vs HLFMX's -63.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.