NEMD vs. EMCB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB).

NEMD and EMCB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NEMD is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Sep 27, 2013. EMCB is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Mar 8, 2012.

Performance

NEMD vs. EMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NEMD vs. EMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	-0.36%	7.07%
EMCB WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund	-0.18%	2.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEMD achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than EMCB's -0.18% return.

NEMD

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: -3.18%
• YTD: -0.36%
• 6M: 3.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMCB

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -2.79%
• YTD: -0.18%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: 5.71%
• 3Y*: 7.32%
• 5Y*: 2.02%
• 10Y*: 4.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEMD vs. EMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NEMD and EMCB have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

NEMD

Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF

EMCB

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund

Return for Risk

NEMD vs. EMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMCB

EMCB Risk / Return Rank: 58
EMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
EMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
EMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 53
EMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEMD vs. EMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NEMD	EMCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.71	0.45	+1.26

Correlation

The correlation between NEMD and EMCB is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NEMD vs. EMCB - Dividend Comparison

NEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than EMCB's 5.46% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	3.88%	2.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMCB WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund	5.46%	5.47%	5.29%	5.09%	4.04%	3.43%	3.85%	4.17%	4.20%	4.04%	4.08%	5.09%

Drawdowns

NEMD vs. EMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMD drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, smaller than the maximum EMCB drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMD and EMCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEMD	EMCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-22.81%	+18.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.43%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.35%	-2.79%	-0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.49%	-4.27%	+3.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NEMD	EMCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.20%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.49%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.30%	7.54%	-1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.30%	7.02%	-0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.30%	8.52%	-2.22%