NEMD vs. EIPX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NEMD (Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF) and EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while EIPX is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEMD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EIPX.

Performance

NEMD vs. EIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEMD achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly lower than EIPX's 22.72% return.

NEMD

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 4.12%
• 6M: 4.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EIPX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -1.66%
• YTD: 22.72%
• 6M: 19.76%
• 1Y: 32.68%
• 3Y*: 21.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEMD vs. EIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	4.12%	7.07%
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	22.72%	5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between NEMD and EIPX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025	0.03

NEMD vs. EIPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NEMD	EIPX
Energy	100.0%	69.5%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	4.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.2%
Utilities	-	26.1%

Return for Risk

NEMD vs. EIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPX

EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 90
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEMD vs. EIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NEMD	EIPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.97	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.20	1.21	+0.99

Drawdowns

NEMD vs. EIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMD drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, smaller than the maximum EIPX drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMD and EIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEMD	EIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-15.43%	+11.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.12%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-1.98%	+1.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.57%	-2.27%	+1.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NEMD	EIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.44%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.51%	11.14%	-4.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.51%	15.05%	-8.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.51%	15.05%	-8.54%

NEMD vs. EIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEMD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

NEMD vs. EIPX - Dividend Comparison

NEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than EIPX's 2.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	2.66%	3.23%	3.27%	3.48%	0.34%
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	4.71%	2.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEMD and EIPX in my portfolio?

NEMD and EIPX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NEMD or EIPX?

On fees, NEMD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NEMD or EIPX?

NEMD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NEMD or EIPX?

NEMD has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 2.66% for EIPX.

What is the main difference between NEMD and EIPX?

NEMD is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while EIPX is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NEMD and 0.95% for EIPX.