NEMD vs. DCMT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NEMD (Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. NEMD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

NEMD vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEMD achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 32.24% return.

NEMD

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 4.12%
• 6M: 4.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DCMT

• 1D: -1.67%
• 1M: -3.79%
• YTD: 32.24%
• 6M: 30.67%
• 1Y: 39.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEMD vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	4.12%	7.07%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	32.24%	3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NEMD and DCMT is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025	-0.37

Return for Risk

NEMD vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 73
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEMD vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NEMD	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.20	1.15	+1.06

Drawdowns

NEMD vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMD drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -11.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMD and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEMD	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-11.95%	+7.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-5.08%	+5.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.57%	-3.14%	+2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.61%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NEMD	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.86%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.51%	18.36%	-11.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.51%	15.79%	-9.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.51%	15.79%	-9.28%

NEMD vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEMD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

NEMD vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

NEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than DCMT's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.78%	3.67%	1.59%
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	4.71%	2.39%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEMD and DCMT in my portfolio?

NEMD and DCMT have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NEMD or DCMT?

On fees, NEMD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NEMD or DCMT?

NEMD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NEMD or DCMT?

NEMD has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 2.78% for DCMT.

What is the main difference between NEMD and DCMT?

NEMD is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NEMD and 0.66% for DCMT.