NEMD vs. BILZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NEMD (Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF) and BILZ (PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while BILZ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NEMD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILZ.

Performance

NEMD vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEMD achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly higher than BILZ's 1.47% return.

NEMD

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 4.12%
• 6M: 4.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BILZ

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEMD vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	4.12%	7.07%
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund	1.47%	1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between NEMD and BILZ is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025	0.05

Return for Risk

NEMD vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILZ

BILZ Risk / Return Rank: 100
BILZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEMD vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NEMD	BILZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	19.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.20	10.48	-8.28

Drawdowns

NEMD vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEMD drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMD and BILZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEMD	BILZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-0.52%	-3.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.57%	-0.01%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NEMD	BILZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.51%	0.21%	+6.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.51%	0.43%	+6.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.51%	0.43%	+6.08%

NEMD vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEMD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

NEMD vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison

NEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than BILZ's 4.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund	4.07%	4.19%	4.95%	2.23%
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF	4.71%	2.39%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEMD and BILZ in my portfolio?

NEMD and BILZ have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NEMD or BILZ?

On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NEMD or BILZ?

BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NEMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NEMD or BILZ?

NEMD has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 4.07% for BILZ.

What is the main difference between NEMD and BILZ?

NEMD is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while BILZ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NEMD and 0.14% for BILZ.