NEM vs. TMUS
NEM (Newmont Corporation) and TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) are both stocks. NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while TMUS operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, NEM returned 13.80%/yr vs 16.66%/yr for TMUS. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NEM vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEM achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly higher than TMUS's -5.91% return. Over the past 10 years, NEM has underperformed TMUS with an annualized return of 13.80%, while TMUS has yielded a comparatively higher 16.66% annualized return.
NEM
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -7.88%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 74.95%
- 3Y*
- 36.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
TMUS
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -2.11%
- 1Y
- -15.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.66%
NEM vs. TMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEM Newmont Corporation | 0.82% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.15% | 10.91% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -5.91% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 15.02% | 20.71% | -13.99% | 71.96% | 23.28% | 0.16% | 10.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEM and TMUS is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007 | 0.11 |
The correlation between NEM and TMUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NEM:
$6.34
TMUS:
$9.41
NEM:
15.82
TMUS:
20.09
NEM:
0.41
TMUS:
0.31
NEM:
4.83
TMUS:
2.34
NEM:
$17.23B
TMUS:
$90.53B
NEM:
$8.97B
TMUS:
$34.92B
NEM:
$13.78B
TMUS:
$28.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEM vs. TMUS — Risk / Return Rank
NEM
TMUS
NEM vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Corporation (NEM) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEM | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.91 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | -0.52 | +3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | -0.88 | +8.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEM vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, smaller than the maximum TMUS drawdown of -86.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and TMUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEM | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.30% | -86.29% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.39% | -30.37% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.57% | -33.65% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.40% | -33.65% | -28.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.40% | -33.65% | -28.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.71% | -29.12% | +5.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.37% | -25.96% | -15.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.73% | 17.87% | -7.14% |
Volatility
NEM vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison
Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a higher volatility of 15.74% compared to T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) at 7.72%. This indicates that NEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEM | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.74% | 7.72% | +8.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.43% | 19.08% | +18.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.44% | 24.99% | +22.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.99% | 23.90% | +14.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.67% | 26.08% | +9.59% |
Dividends
NEM vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison
NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than TMUS's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEM Newmont Corporation | 1.02% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.08% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NEM vs. TMUS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmont Corporation and T-Mobile US, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NEM and TMUS have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEM has higher volatility (15.74%) compared to TMUS (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEM dropped -81.30% vs TMUS's -86.29%.
NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEM and TMUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer