PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEM vs. IVZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NEM vs. IVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Newmont Corporation (NEM) and Invesco Ltd. (IVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEM achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than IVZ's 6.54% return. Over the past 10 years, NEM has outperformed IVZ with an annualized return of 13.46%, while IVZ has yielded a comparatively lower 4.48% annualized return.


NEM

1D
-0.72%
1M
-14.84%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
11.71%
1Y
91.07%
3Y*
36.63%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
13.46%

IVZ

1D
0.73%
1M
0.64%
YTD
6.54%
6M
8.44%
1Y
98.16%
3Y*
25.82%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
4.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEM vs. IVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEM
Newmont Corporation
-0.43%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%
IVZ
Invesco Ltd.
6.54%56.94%3.02%6.05%-18.71%35.56%3.06%14.91%-52.05%24.67%

Correlation

The correlation between NEM and IVZ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 1995

0.12

The correlation between NEM and IVZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NEM:

$6.34

IVZ:

-$0.62

PS Ratio

NEM:

4.77

IVZ:

1.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEM:

$17.23B

IVZ:

$6.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEM:

$8.97B

IVZ:

$2.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

NEM:

$13.78B

IVZ:

$1.38B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEM vs. IVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

IVZ
IVZ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
IVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEM vs. IVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Corporation (NEM) and Invesco Ltd. (IVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEMIVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

4.48

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

12.09

-3.15

NEM vs. IVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the IVZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEM and IVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEMIVZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.82

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.11

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.11

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.18

-0.06

Drawdowns

NEM vs. IVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, roughly equal to the maximum IVZ drawdown of -83.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and IVZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEMIVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.30%

-83.91%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.25%

-22.03%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.57%

-36.52%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.40%

-53.40%

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.40%

-79.72%

+17.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.65%

-4.93%

-19.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.38%

-36.00%

-5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.22%

8.15%

+2.07%

Volatility

NEM vs. IVZ - Volatility Comparison

Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a higher volatility of 14.19% compared to Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) at 9.52%. This indicates that NEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEMIVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.19%

9.52%

+4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.93%

25.49%

+11.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.87%

35.09%

+11.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.83%

36.58%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.59%

39.41%

-3.82%

Dividends

NEM vs. IVZ - Dividend Comparison

NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than IVZ's 3.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVZ
Invesco Ltd.
3.07%3.18%4.66%6.15%4.07%2.89%4.45%6.84%7.11%3.15%3.66%3.17%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.03%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Financials

NEM vs. IVZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmont Corporation and Invesco Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B202220232024202520260
1.69B
(NEM) Total Revenue
(IVZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NEM and IVZ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEM has higher volatility (14.19%) compared to IVZ (9.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEM dropped -81.30% vs IVZ's -83.91%.

IVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEM and IVZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer