NEM vs. ECHO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

NEM (Newmont Corporation) and ECHO (EchoStar Corporation) are both stocks. NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while ECHO operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

NEM vs. ECHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Newmont Corporation (NEM) and EchoStar Corporation (ECHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NEM

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -14.94%
• YTD: -6.05%
• 6M: -7.91%
• 1Y: 62.02%
• 3Y*: 32.74%
• 5Y*: 11.43%
• 10Y*: 11.46%

ECHO

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEM vs. ECHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NEM Newmont Corporation	-8.25%
ECHO EchoStar Corporation	-1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NEM and ECHO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2026	-0.14

Return for Risk

NEM vs. ECHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEM

NEM Risk / Return Rank: 77
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 78

ECHO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEM vs. ECHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Corporation (NEM) and EchoStar Corporation (ECHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NEM	ECHO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.24	—	—

Drawdowns

NEM vs. ECHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than ECHO's maximum drawdown of -6.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and ECHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEM	ECHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.30%	-6.48%	-74.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.91%	-2.33%	-26.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.35%	-3.67%	-37.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NEM	ECHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.73%	42.51%	+5.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.09%	42.51%	-4.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.71%	42.51%	-6.80%

Dividends

NEM vs. ECHO - Dividend Comparison

NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while ECHO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECHO EchoStar Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NEM Newmont Corporation	1.09%	1.00%	2.69%	3.87%	4.66%	3.55%	1.74%	3.31%	1.62%	0.67%	0.37%	0.56%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEM and ECHO in my portfolio?

NEM and ECHO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.