PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEIMX vs. LOMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEIMX vs. LOMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) and Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEIMX achieves a 16.92% return, which is significantly higher than LOMAX's 10.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NEIMX having a 10.28% annualized return and LOMAX not far ahead at 10.66%.


NEIMX

1D
0.63%
1M
0.40%
YTD
16.92%
6M
16.60%
1Y
33.07%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
10.28%

LOMAX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
10.12%
6M
9.85%
1Y
24.39%
3Y*
15.39%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEIMX vs. LOMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
16.92%18.68%13.50%6.15%-5.16%23.85%-5.97%23.49%-9.76%19.00%
LOMAX
Edgar Lomax Value Fund
10.12%18.09%10.29%5.19%-0.46%25.80%-5.77%23.27%-3.31%19.52%

Correlation

The correlation between NEIMX and LOMAX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2003

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between NEIMX and LOMAX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEIMX vs. LOMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEIMX
NEIMX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NEIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

LOMAX
LOMAX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
LOMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LOMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEIMX vs. LOMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) and Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEIMXLOMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.42

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.71

5.13

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.14

16.79

+6.35

NEIMX vs. LOMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEIMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.08, which is comparable to the LOMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEIMX and LOMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEIMX vs. LOMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEIMX drawdown since its inception was -92.94%, which is greater than LOMAX's maximum drawdown of -57.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEIMX and LOMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEIMXLOMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.94%

-57.82%

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-4.86%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.94%

-11.93%

-81.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.94%

-17.50%

-75.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.94%

-37.81%

-55.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.02%

-2.80%

-86.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-9.39%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

1.48%

-0.06%

Volatility

NEIMX vs. LOMAX - Volatility Comparison

Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX) at 3.33%. This indicates that NEIMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEIMXLOMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

3.33%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

7.18%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.67%

9.95%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

576.30%

13.24%

+563.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

407.54%

16.52%

+391.02%

NEIMX vs. LOMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEIMX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than LOMAX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEIMX vs. LOMAX - Dividend Comparison

NEIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than LOMAX's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOMAX
Edgar Lomax Value Fund
5.75%6.34%6.27%4.66%7.73%5.11%12.52%2.16%15.97%8.80%2.68%15.54%
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
0.65%0.76%1.10%1.36%3.60%17.65%1.20%2.26%1.20%6.64%10.20%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEIMX and LOMAX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEIMX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to LOMAX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEIMX dropped -92.94% vs LOMAX's -57.82%.

NEIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEIMX and LOMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer