NEIMX vs. CSVZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) and Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX).
NEIMX is managed by Neiman Funds. It was launched on Apr 1, 2003. CSVZX is an actively managed fund by Columbia. It was launched on Sep 27, 2010.
Performance
NEIMX vs. CSVZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NEIMX vs. CSVZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund | 3.55% | 18.68% | 13.50% | 6.15% | -5.16% | 23.85% | -5.97% | 23.49% | -9.76% | 19.00% |
CSVZX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class | 0.27% | 27.92% | 12.82% | 5.78% | -0.84% | 26.61% | 6.43% | 26.89% | -12.12% | 19.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEIMX achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly higher than CSVZX's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, NEIMX has underperformed CSVZX with an annualized return of 9.03%, while CSVZX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.
NEIMX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 23.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.03%
CSVZX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -8.84%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 24.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NEIMX vs. CSVZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEIMX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than CSVZX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NEIMX vs. CSVZX — Risk / Return Rank
NEIMX
CSVZX
NEIMX vs. CSVZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) and Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NEIMX | CSVZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 1.52 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 2.05 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 1.92 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.67 | 8.25 | +2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEIMX | CSVZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.52 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.69 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | 0.67 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.63 | -0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between NEIMX and CSVZX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NEIMX vs. CSVZX - Dividend Comparison
NEIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than CSVZX's 8.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund | 0.73% | 0.76% | 1.10% | 1.36% | 3.60% | 17.65% | 1.20% | 2.26% | 1.20% | 6.64% | 10.20% | 4.19% |
CSVZX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class | 8.29% | 8.31% | 3.54% | 3.67% | 1.56% | 5.89% | 7.41% | 6.92% | 4.95% | 3.73% | 6.95% | 4.61% |
Drawdowns
NEIMX vs. CSVZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEIMX drawdown since its inception was -92.94%, which is greater than CSVZX's maximum drawdown of -41.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEIMX and CSVZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEIMX | CSVZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.94% | -41.46% | -51.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.78% | -12.39% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.94% | -18.36% | -74.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.94% | -41.46% | -51.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.28% | -9.00% | -81.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.91% | -4.79% | -5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.88% | -0.75% |
Volatility
NEIMX vs. CSVZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) is 3.41%, while Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that NEIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSVZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NEIMX | CSVZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 3.74% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.30% | 9.04% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.57% | 16.95% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 576.30% | 15.88% | +560.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 407.62% | 18.69% | +388.93% |