CSVZX vs. VTV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CSVZX (Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. CSVZX is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSVZX returned 13.45%/yr vs 12.95%/yr for VTV. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSVZX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

CSVZX vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSVZX achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 14.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSVZX having a 13.45% annualized return and VTV not far behind at 12.95%.

CSVZX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 13.56%
• 6M: 13.03%
• 1Y: 36.42%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 13.08%
• 10Y*: 13.45%

VTV

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 14.47%
• 6M: 13.93%
• 1Y: 27.19%
• 3Y*: 18.66%
• 5Y*: 12.22%
• 10Y*: 12.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSVZX vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSVZX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class	13.56%	27.92%	12.82%	5.78%	-0.84%	26.61%	6.43%	26.89%	-12.12%	19.05%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	14.47%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-2.09%	26.53%	2.33%	25.66%	-5.47%	17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CSVZX and VTV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011	0.94

The correlation between CSVZX and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CSVZX vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSVZX

CSVZX Risk / Return Rank: 90
CSVZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CSVZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CSVZX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CSVZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CSVZX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 84
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSVZX vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSVZX	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.06	2.63	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.24	3.75	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.47	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.15	4.30	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.96	16.20	+0.76

CSVZX vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSVZX Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSVZX and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSVZX vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSVZX drawdown since its inception was -41.46%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSVZX and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSVZX	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.46%	-59.27%	+17.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.00%	-6.35%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.76%	-14.52%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.36%	-17.04%	-1.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.46%	-36.78%	-4.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-0.56%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.74%	-7.85%	+3.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	1.68%	+0.52%

Volatility

CSVZX vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.41%. This indicates that CSVZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSVZX	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	3.41%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.30%	7.85%	+1.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.20%	10.39%	+1.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.93%	13.88%	+2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.71%	16.65%	+2.06%

CSVZX vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSVZX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSVZX vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

CSVZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.32%, more than VTV's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSVZX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class	7.32%	8.31%	3.54%	3.67%	1.56%	5.89%	7.41%	6.92%	4.95%	3.73%	6.95%	4.61%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.83%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSVZX and VTV in my portfolio?

CSVZX and VTV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSVZX or VTV?

CSVZX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to VTV (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSVZX dropped -41.46% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSVZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.