PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEHI vs. IBLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEHI vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEHI achieves a -35.82% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 32.34% return.


NEHI

1D
-5.42%
1M
-21.57%
YTD
-35.82%
6M
-37.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBLC

1D
-3.00%
1M
13.52%
YTD
32.34%
6M
15.25%
1Y
73.27%
3Y*
48.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEHI vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NEHI
NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF
-35.82%-3.02%
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
32.34%-12.92%

Correlation

The correlation between NEHI and IBLC is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEHI vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEHI

IBLC
IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEHI vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NEHI vs. IBLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEHIIBLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.08

0.40

-1.48

Drawdowns

NEHI vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEHI drawdown since its inception was -42.60%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEHI and IBLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEHIIBLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.60%

-62.54%

+19.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.60%

-12.99%

-29.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.09%

-25.89%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.56%

Volatility

NEHI vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEHIIBLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.40%

54.94%

+2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.40%

64.49%

-7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.40%

64.49%

-7.09%

NEHI vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEHI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEHI vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

NEHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.35%, more than IBLC's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
4.77%6.31%1.60%1.79%0.84%
NEHI
NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF
24.35%2.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEHI and IBLC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for NEHI.

NEHI has the higher dividend yield at 24.35%, compared with 4.77% for IBLC.

They also come from different issuers: Neos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for NEHI and 0.47% for IBLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEHI and IBLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer