PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFZX vs. JMSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFZX vs. JMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX) and JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFZX achieves a -1.28% return, which is significantly lower than JMSIX's 1.12% return. Over the past 10 years, NEFZX has underperformed JMSIX with an annualized return of 2.78%, while JMSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.76% annualized return.


NEFZX

1D
0.25%
1M
-0.75%
6M
-1.80%
YTD
-1.28%
1Y
2.61%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
2.78%
ALL TIME*
6.36%

JMSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.47%
6M
0.74%
YTD
1.12%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
6.81%
5Y*
2.71%
10Y*
3.76%
ALL TIME*
2.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NEFZX vs. JMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEFZX
Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund
-1.28%8.92%7.05%8.02%-12.82%3.85%1.15%10.84%-3.00%7.22%
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund Class I
1.12%7.68%7.78%6.14%-8.24%3.59%3.07%11.82%1.03%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFZX and JMSIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014

0.57

The correlation between NEFZX and JMSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFZX vs. JMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NEFZX
NEFZX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
NEFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

JMSIX
JMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
JMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NEFZX vs. JMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX) and JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEFZXJMSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.49

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

2.89

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.81

11.55

-9.73

NEFZX vs. JMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the JMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFZX and JMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEFZX vs. JMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFZX drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, which is greater than JMSIX's maximum drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFZX and JMSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFZXJMSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.07%

-18.40%

-13.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.17%

-1.62%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.38%

-2.25%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

-11.39%

-5.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.21%

-18.40%

+1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

-0.59%

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-2.54%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

0.41%

+1.10%

Volatility

NEFZX vs. JMSIX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX) at 0.53%. This indicates that NEFZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFZXJMSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

0.53%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.62%

1.94%

+1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.47%

2.50%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.62%

3.73%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.21%

3.86%

+1.35%

NEFZX vs. JMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFZX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JMSIX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFZX vs. JMSIX - Dividend Comparison

NEFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than JMSIX's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund Class I
5.54%5.95%5.78%4.43%4.78%4.00%4.95%5.10%5.43%5.42%0.46%0.00%
NEFZX
Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund
4.01%3.83%5.60%5.37%6.34%2.64%4.20%3.51%4.28%4.06%4.76%10.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEFZX and JMSIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEFZX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to JMSIX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFZX dropped -32.07% vs JMSIX's -18.40%.

JMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFZX and JMSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer