NEFZX vs. ECSIX
NEFZX (Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund) and ECSIX (Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, NEFZX returned 2.78%/yr vs 3.86%/yr for ECSIX. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NEFZX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for ECSIX.
Performance
NEFZX vs. ECSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEFZX achieves a -1.28% return, which is significantly lower than ECSIX's 2.00% return. Over the past 10 years, NEFZX has underperformed ECSIX with an annualized return of 2.78%, while ECSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.86% annualized return.
NEFZX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- -1.28%
- 1Y
- 2.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.35%
- 5Y*
- 1.59%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.36%
ECSIX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 6.67%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- 3.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NEFZX vs. ECSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEFZX Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund | -1.28% | 8.92% | 7.05% | 8.02% | -12.82% | 3.85% | 1.15% | 10.84% | -3.00% | 7.22% |
ECSIX Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund | 2.00% | 10.19% | 5.71% | 7.31% | -3.31% | 0.69% | 6.60% | 5.76% | -3.37% | 4.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEFZX and ECSIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 1995 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, NEFZX and ECSIX have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEFZX vs. ECSIX — Risk / Return Rank
NEFZX
ECSIX
NEFZX vs. ECSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEFZX | ECSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.53 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 3.04 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | 10.17 | -8.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEFZX vs. ECSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEFZX drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, which is greater than ECSIX's maximum drawdown of -12.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFZX and ECSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEFZX | ECSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.07% | -12.95% | -19.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.17% | -2.43% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.38% | -2.56% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.19% | -7.19% | -10.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.21% | -12.53% | -4.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -0.58% | -2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -1.34% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 0.72% | +0.79% |
Volatility
NEFZX vs. ECSIX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX) at 0.87%. This indicates that NEFZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEFZX | ECSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 0.87% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.62% | 2.35% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.47% | 2.87% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 3.23% | +2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.21% | 3.17% | +2.04% |
NEFZX vs. ECSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEFZX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ECSIX's 1.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEFZX vs. ECSIX - Dividend Comparison
NEFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than ECSIX's 6.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECSIX Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund | 6.39% | 5.07% | 6.21% | 6.18% | 4.78% | 3.54% | 3.47% | 3.53% | 3.19% | 2.96% | 3.20% | 3.54% |
NEFZX Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund | 4.01% | 3.83% | 5.60% | 5.37% | 6.34% | 2.64% | 4.20% | 3.51% | 4.28% | 4.06% | 4.76% | 10.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEFZX and ECSIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEFZX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to ECSIX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFZX dropped -32.07% vs ECSIX's -12.95%.
ECSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NEFZX and ECSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer