NEFSX vs. NOIAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NEFSX (Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund) and NOIAX (Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund) are both mutual funds - NEFSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Natixis, while NOIAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Natixis. Over the past 10 years, NEFSX returned 15.08%/yr vs 7.08%/yr for NOIAX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NEFSX charges 1.14%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for NOIAX.

Performance

NEFSX vs. NOIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund (NEFSX) and Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFSX achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than NOIAX's 1.38% return. Over the past 10 years, NEFSX has outperformed NOIAX with an annualized return of 15.08%, while NOIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.

NEFSX

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 2.39%
• YTD: 0.81%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 14.35%
• 3Y*: 19.30%
• 5Y*: 10.95%
• 10Y*: 15.08%

NOIAX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 1.38%
• 6M: 3.81%
• 1Y: 14.06%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 3.21%
• 10Y*: 7.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEFSX vs. NOIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NEFSX Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund	0.81%	17.23%	25.79%	37.13%	-21.15%	23.21%	22.12%	31.08%	-6.67%	26.28%
NOIAX Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund	1.38%	32.80%	-5.28%	18.93%	-15.88%	8.73%	4.06%	24.35%	-24.20%	29.57%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFSX and NOIAX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2010	0.75

The correlation between NEFSX and NOIAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NEFSX vs. NOIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEFSX

NEFSX Risk / Return Rank: 22
NEFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
NEFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NEFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
NEFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
NEFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

NOIAX

NOIAX Risk / Return Rank: 12
NOIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
NOIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
NOIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
NOIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
NOIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEFSX vs. NOIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund (NEFSX) and Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NEFSX	NOIAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	0.98	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	1.47	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.18	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	1.13	+0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.12	3.43	+1.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NEFSX vs. NOIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the NOIAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFSX and NOIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NEFSX	NOIAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	0.98	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.16	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.32	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.28	+0.31

Drawdowns

NEFSX vs. NOIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFSX drawdown since its inception was -55.83%, roughly equal to the maximum NOIAX drawdown of -53.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFSX and NOIAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEFSX	NOIAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.83%	-53.97%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.20%	-14.34%	+3.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.58%	-18.70%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.08%	-38.21%	+8.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.27%	-53.97%	+21.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-4.09%	+2.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.75%	-11.58%	-0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	4.50%	-0.64%

Volatility

NEFSX vs. NOIAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund (NEFSX) is 2.86%, while Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that NEFSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NEFSX	NOIAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	5.11%	-2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.28%	12.92%	-2.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.99%	16.64%	-3.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.59%	20.41%	-0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.71%	22.43%	-2.72%

NEFSX vs. NOIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFSX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than NOIAX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

NEFSX vs. NOIAX - Dividend Comparison

NEFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.23%, more than NOIAX's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NEFSX Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund	9.23%	5.92%	6.38%	8.13%	18.10%	11.12%	13.07%	10.85%	11.18%	3.55%	1.88%	5.09%
NOIAX Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund	3.06%	3.11%	2.96%	1.72%	1.77%	1.55%	0.24%	2.99%	4.56%	1.04%	2.07%	2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NEFSX and NOIAX in my portfolio?

NEFSX and NOIAX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NEFSX or NOIAX?

NOIAX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to NEFSX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFSX dropped -55.83% vs NOIAX's -53.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.