PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFLX vs. VGIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFLX vs. VGIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund (NEFLX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VGIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFLX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than VGIVX's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, NEFLX has underperformed VGIVX with an annualized return of 1.41%, while VGIVX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.63% annualized return.


NEFLX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.36%
6M
0.67%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
1.33%
10Y*
1.41%

VGIVX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.80%
1Y
10.59%
3Y*
9.69%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
3.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEFLX vs. VGIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEFLX
Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund
0.36%5.01%3.14%4.19%-4.74%-1.25%3.19%3.14%1.14%0.84%
VGIVX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.43%13.05%6.31%10.48%-16.72%-2.41%5.83%14.03%-2.72%8.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFLX and VGIVX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.35

The correlation between NEFLX and VGIVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFLX vs. VGIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEFLX
NEFLX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NEFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VGIVX
VGIVX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VGIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VGIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEFLX vs. VGIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund (NEFLX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VGIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEFLXVGIVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.55

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

2.83

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.03

11.32

-1.29

NEFLX vs. VGIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the VGIVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFLX and VGIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEFLXVGIVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.70

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.36

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.57

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

0.69

+0.66

Drawdowns

NEFLX vs. VGIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFLX drawdown since its inception was -7.37%, smaller than the maximum VGIVX drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFLX and VGIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFLXVGIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-26.79%

+19.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-3.93%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.34%

-7.14%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.21%

-26.79%

+19.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.37%

-26.79%

+19.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.32%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-4.70%

+3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

0.98%

-0.56%

Volatility

NEFLX vs. VGIVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund (NEFLX) is 0.53%, while Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VGIVX) has a volatility of 1.56%. This indicates that NEFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFLXVGIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

1.56%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

3.35%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96%

4.13%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.47%

6.30%

-3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.99%

6.36%

-4.37%

NEFLX vs. VGIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFLX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than VGIVX's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFLX vs. VGIVX - Dividend Comparison

NEFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than VGIVX's 5.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEFLX
Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund
3.14%3.21%3.18%2.96%1.26%0.59%1.12%2.02%1.92%1.73%1.50%1.54%
VGIVX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
5.89%5.95%6.58%5.53%5.32%3.53%4.21%4.62%4.62%4.67%4.76%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEFLX and VGIVX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGIVX has higher volatility (1.56%) compared to NEFLX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFLX dropped -7.37% vs VGIVX's -26.79%.

VGIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFLX and VGIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer