PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFLX vs. LSIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFLX vs. LSIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund (NEFLX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEFLX achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than LSIIX's 0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, NEFLX has underperformed LSIIX with an annualized return of 1.40%, while LSIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.09% annualized return.


NEFLX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.66%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
1.40%

LSIIX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.94%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.56%
1Y
3.36%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
0.83%
10Y*
3.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEFLX vs. LSIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEFLX
Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund
0.27%5.01%3.14%4.19%-4.74%-1.25%3.19%3.14%1.14%0.84%
LSIIX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y
0.46%5.58%2.91%7.50%-11.31%0.18%11.60%9.04%-0.31%6.65%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFLX and LSIIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1996

0.64

The correlation between NEFLX and LSIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFLX vs. LSIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEFLX
NEFLX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NEFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

LSIIX
LSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
LSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
LSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEFLX vs. LSIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund (NEFLX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NEFLXLSIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.18

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

1.34

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

3.69

+5.17

NEFLX vs. LSIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the LSIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFLX and LSIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NEFLX vs. LSIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFLX drawdown since its inception was -7.37%, smaller than the maximum LSIIX drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFLX and LSIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFLXLSIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-20.77%

+13.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-2.99%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.34%

-5.45%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.21%

-15.62%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.37%

-15.62%

+8.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-1.13%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-2.42%

+1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

1.03%

-0.63%

Volatility

NEFLX vs. LSIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund (NEFLX) is 0.58%, while Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX) has a volatility of 1.16%. This indicates that NEFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFLXLSIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

1.16%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

2.89%

-1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95%

3.96%

-2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.48%

5.29%

-2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.99%

4.51%

-2.52%

NEFLX vs. LSIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFLX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than LSIIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFLX vs. LSIIX - Dividend Comparison

NEFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than LSIIX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSIIX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y
3.53%3.68%4.86%4.25%3.32%4.10%8.20%3.56%2.18%4.10%6.71%3.91%
NEFLX
Loomis Sayles Limited Term Government And Agency Fund
3.15%3.21%3.18%2.96%1.26%0.59%1.12%2.02%1.92%1.73%1.50%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEFLX and LSIIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSIIX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to NEFLX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFLX dropped -7.37% vs LSIIX's -20.77%.

NEFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFLX and LSIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer