PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEFFX vs. PRGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEFFX vs. PRGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2 (NEFFX) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NEFFX having a 22.99% return and PRGSX slightly higher at 23.78%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NEFFX having a 16.65% annualized return and PRGSX not far ahead at 16.95%.


NEFFX

1D
0.02%
1M
10.70%
YTD
22.99%
6M
25.48%
1Y
55.04%
3Y*
31.00%
5Y*
14.59%
10Y*
16.65%

PRGSX

1D
1.03%
1M
10.17%
YTD
23.78%
6M
24.65%
1Y
44.27%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
16.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEFFX vs. PRGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2
22.99%31.31%23.87%29.47%-29.50%12.31%33.79%26.75%-4.17%34.66%
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund
23.78%21.42%16.80%25.70%-28.01%9.81%52.29%35.84%-4.51%32.64%

Correlation

The correlation between NEFFX and PRGSX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008

0.94

The correlation between NEFFX and PRGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEFFX vs. PRGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEFFX
NEFFX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NEFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGSX
PRGSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PRGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEFFX vs. PRGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2 (NEFFX) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEFFXPRGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.44

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

3.48

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.96

14.22

+4.74

NEFFX vs. PRGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEFFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is higher than the PRGSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEFFX and PRGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEFFXPRGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.28

2.48

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.52

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.86

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.53

+0.16

Drawdowns

NEFFX vs. PRGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEFFX drawdown since its inception was -45.12%, smaller than the maximum PRGSX drawdown of -64.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEFFX and PRGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEFFXPRGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.12%

-64.06%

+18.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-12.77%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.78%

-21.13%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.95%

-38.11%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.95%

-38.11%

+1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-13.48%

+5.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.11%

-0.15%

Volatility

NEFFX vs. PRGSX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2 (NEFFX) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) have volatilities of 5.29% and 5.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEFFXPRGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

5.50%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.71%

14.84%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

17.93%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.39%

19.66%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

19.77%

-0.66%

NEFFX vs. PRGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEFFX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGSX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEFFX vs. PRGSX - Dividend Comparison

NEFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, more than PRGSX's 7.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2
8.03%9.87%9.61%4.19%0.19%7.55%2.69%7.57%10.31%8.50%2.51%6.41%
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund
7.76%9.60%6.73%0.27%0.00%13.67%5.67%2.21%5.81%0.03%0.63%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, NEFFX and PRGSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRGSX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to NEFFX (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEFFX dropped -45.12% vs PRGSX's -64.06%.

NEFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEFFX and PRGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer