NEEGX vs. CTIGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX).
NEEGX is managed by Needham. It was launched on Jan 2, 1996. CTIGX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Jul 31, 2019.
Performance
NEEGX vs. CTIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NEEGX vs. CTIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | 15.68% | 8.76% | 14.45% | 26.85% | -33.57% | 27.63% | 41.73% | 12.03% |
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 0.46% | 21.21% | 44.09% | 12.26% | -34.88% | 7.64% | 58.94% | -3.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEEGX achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly higher than CTIGX's 0.46% return.
NEEGX
- 1D
- 4.73%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- 15.68%
- 6M
- 17.81%
- 1Y
- 49.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
CTIGX
- 1D
- 5.87%
- 1M
- -6.37%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 39.29%
- 3Y*
- 23.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.06%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NEEGX vs. CTIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEEGX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than CTIGX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NEEGX vs. CTIGX — Risk / Return Rank
NEEGX
CTIGX
NEEGX vs. CTIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NEEGX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 1.37 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.16 | 1.93 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.25 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 3.51 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.67 | 12.62 | -1.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEEGX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.37 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.19 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.41 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between NEEGX and CTIGX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NEEGX vs. CTIGX - Dividend Comparison
NEEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than CTIGX's 4.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | 6.54% | 7.57% | 3.92% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 6.92% | 5.73% | 11.31% | 17.79% | 9.70% | 4.22% | 6.74% |
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 4.57% | 4.59% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NEEGX vs. CTIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEEGX drawdown since its inception was -53.60%, which is greater than CTIGX's maximum drawdown of -46.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEEGX and CTIGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEEGX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.60% | -46.26% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.15% | -11.56% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.35% | -46.26% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.54% | -6.37% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.95% | -19.05% | +8.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 3.21% | +1.40% |
Volatility
NEEGX vs. CTIGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) is 11.31%, while Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a volatility of 12.85%. This indicates that NEEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NEEGX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.31% | 12.85% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.91% | 20.84% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.23% | 28.76% | +3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.04% | 26.85% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.01% | 29.11% | -4.10% |