PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEAIX vs. WMICX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NEAIX vs. WMICX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX) and Wasatch Micro Cap Fund (WMICX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEAIX achieves a 59.81% return, which is significantly higher than WMICX's 13.73% return.


NEAIX

1D
3.25%
1M
17.12%
YTD
59.81%
6M
61.32%
1Y
97.17%
3Y*
39.29%
5Y*
24.27%
10Y*

WMICX

1D
0.31%
1M
4.67%
YTD
13.73%
6M
13.59%
1Y
29.57%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
-0.29%
10Y*
14.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEAIX vs. WMICX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEAIX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class
59.81%26.99%14.86%38.37%-27.02%38.46%52.49%44.68%-15.64%10.07%
WMICX
Wasatch Micro Cap Fund
13.73%4.84%20.91%22.58%-40.64%4.51%64.84%42.31%1.73%36.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NEAIX and WMICX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.82

The correlation between NEAIX and WMICX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEAIX vs. WMICX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEAIX
NEAIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NEAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

WMICX
WMICX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
WMICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMICX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
WMICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMICX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEAIX vs. WMICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX) and Wasatch Micro Cap Fund (WMICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEAIXWMICXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.94

1.63

+2.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.42

2.39

+2.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.27

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.27

2.21

+5.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

29.35

7.63

+21.72

NEAIX vs. WMICX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEAIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.94, which is higher than the WMICX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEAIX and WMICX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEAIXWMICXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94

1.63

+2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

-0.01

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.66

+0.26

Drawdowns

NEAIX vs. WMICX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEAIX drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum WMICX drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEAIX and WMICX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEAIXWMICXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.93%

-65.21%

+29.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.98%

-14.32%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.21%

-29.44%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.93%

-48.70%

+12.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.45%

+10.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.60%

-13.34%

+4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

4.13%

-0.67%

Volatility

NEAIX vs. WMICX - Volatility Comparison

Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX) has a higher volatility of 10.14% compared to Wasatch Micro Cap Fund (WMICX) at 5.59%. This indicates that NEAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEAIXWMICXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.14%

5.59%

+4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.44%

13.74%

+6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.80%

19.39%

+6.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.58%

24.49%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.60%

24.37%

+0.23%

NEAIX vs. WMICX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NEAIX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WMICX's 1.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

NEAIX vs. WMICX - Dividend Comparison

NEAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while WMICX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEAIX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class
1.26%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.84%3.80%10.42%16.35%5.14%0.00%0.00%
WMICX
Wasatch Micro Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%30.82%5.68%11.40%29.75%15.30%9.30%16.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


NEAIX and WMICX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEAIX has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to WMICX (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEAIX dropped -35.93% vs WMICX's -65.21%.

NEAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEAIX and WMICX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer