PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDVG vs. NURE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDVG vs. NURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF (NDVG) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NDVG

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NURE

1D
0.55%
1M
4.16%
YTD
11.00%
6M
11.80%
1Y
7.38%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDVG vs. NURE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NDVG
Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF
-1.62%10.06%17.60%15.15%-9.55%11.07%
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
11.00%-7.51%6.65%13.09%-28.48%13.22%

Correlation

The correlation between NDVG and NURE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2021

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between NDVG and NURE has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NDVG vs. NURE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NDVG
NURE

Technology

28.9%

-

Financial Services

14.7%

-

Industrials

10.2%

-

Healthcare

9.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Energy

5.3%

-

Utilities

5.1%

-

Real Estate

3.9%
100.0%

Communication Services

2.7%

-

Basic Materials

2.2%

-

Technology

NDVG
28.9%
NURE

-

Financial Services

NDVG
14.7%
NURE

-

Industrials

NDVG
10.2%
NURE

-

Healthcare

NDVG
9.8%
NURE

-

Consumer Cyclical

NDVG
9.7%
NURE

-

Consumer Defensive

NDVG
7.7%
NURE

-

Energy

NDVG
5.3%
NURE

-

Utilities

NDVG
5.1%
NURE

-

Real Estate

NDVG
3.9%
NURE
100.0%

Communication Services

NDVG
2.7%
NURE

-

Basic Materials

NDVG
2.2%
NURE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDVG vs. NURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDVG

NURE
NURE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
NURE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NURE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDVG vs. NURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF (NDVG) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NDVG vs. NURE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NDVGNUREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

Drawdowns

NDVG vs. NURE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDVGNUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

Volatility

NDVG vs. NURE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDVGNUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.80%

NDVG vs. NURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDVG has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than NURE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDVG vs. NURE - Dividend Comparison

NDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than NURE's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NDVG
Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF
4.41%1.05%1.20%1.24%1.34%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
4.48%4.56%3.51%3.73%2.80%1.34%3.41%3.28%4.11%3.86%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


NDVG and NURE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NURE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NURE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for NDVG.

NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 4.41% for NDVG.

NDVG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NURE is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for NDVG and 0.35% for NURE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDVG and NURE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer