PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDVAX vs. MFEKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDVAX vs. MFEKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class A (NDVAX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDVAX achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly higher than MFEKX's 5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, NDVAX has underperformed MFEKX with an annualized return of 10.21%, while MFEKX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.64% annualized return.


NDVAX

1D
1.22%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
9.45%
6M
9.00%
1Y
19.44%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
10.21%

MFEKX

1D
0.53%
1M
1.98%
YTD
5.54%
6M
4.86%
1Y
15.97%
3Y*
26.40%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
17.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDVAX vs. MFEKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDVAX
MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class A
9.45%2.16%9.07%10.92%-11.02%33.30%5.44%33.31%-11.40%14.62%
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
5.54%12.44%49.62%36.27%-31.07%23.71%31.77%37.82%2.40%30.97%

Correlation

The correlation between NDVAX and MFEKX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2011

0.64

The correlation between NDVAX and MFEKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDVAX vs. MFEKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDVAX
NDVAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NDVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
NDVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MFEKX
MFEKX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MFEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDVAX vs. MFEKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class A (NDVAX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NDVAXMFEKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.18

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

0.94

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.72

3.04

+2.67

NDVAX vs. MFEKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the MFEKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDVAX and MFEKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NDVAXMFEKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.02

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.64

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.83

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.87

-0.38

Drawdowns

NDVAX vs. MFEKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDVAX drawdown since its inception was -44.06%, which is greater than MFEKX's maximum drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDVAX and MFEKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDVAXMFEKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.06%

-36.06%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-17.27%

+6.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.67%

-23.22%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.67%

-36.06%

+10.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.06%

-36.06%

-8.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-1.08%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-5.63%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

5.30%

-1.90%

Volatility

NDVAX vs. MFEKX - Volatility Comparison

MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class A (NDVAX) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) at 3.89%. This indicates that NDVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFEKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDVAXMFEKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

3.89%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

12.30%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.51%

15.88%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.07%

21.88%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.86%

21.20%

+0.66%

NDVAX vs. MFEKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDVAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than MFEKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDVAX vs. MFEKX - Dividend Comparison

NDVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.70%, less than MFEKX's 14.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
14.04%14.82%25.31%4.82%1.04%2.74%3.55%1.57%3.88%2.49%1.70%3.64%
NDVAX
MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class A
9.70%10.62%6.38%6.06%8.07%9.19%3.82%4.60%7.86%5.16%4.29%3.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


NDVAX and MFEKX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NDVAX has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to MFEKX (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDVAX dropped -44.06% vs MFEKX's -36.06%.

NDVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDVAX and MFEKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer