PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDVAX vs. VSMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDVAX vs. VSMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class A (NDVAX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDVAX achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly lower than VSMVX's 17.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NDVAX having a 10.93% annualized return and VSMVX not far behind at 10.71%.


NDVAX

1D
0.27%
1M
2.98%
YTD
12.22%
6M
10.30%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
12.15%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
10.93%

VSMVX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.22%
YTD
17.74%
6M
16.42%
1Y
38.16%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDVAX vs. VSMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDVAX
MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class A
12.22%2.16%9.07%10.92%-11.02%33.30%5.44%33.31%-11.40%14.62%
VSMVX
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
17.74%6.38%7.53%14.85%-11.12%30.85%2.79%24.47%-12.67%11.64%

Correlation

The correlation between NDVAX and VSMVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2012

0.96

The correlation between NDVAX and VSMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDVAX vs. VSMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDVAX
NDVAX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
NDVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NDVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMVX
VSMVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VSMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDVAX vs. VSMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class A (NDVAX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NDVAXVSMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.37

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

4.28

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

14.20

-7.75

NDVAX vs. VSMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the VSMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDVAX and VSMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDVAX vs. VSMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDVAX drawdown since its inception was -44.06%, smaller than the maximum VSMVX drawdown of -47.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDVAX and VSMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDVAXVSMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.06%

-47.61%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-9.33%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.67%

-28.81%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.67%

-28.81%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.06%

-47.61%

+3.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.37%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-7.62%

+1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

2.81%

+0.58%

Volatility

NDVAX vs. VSMVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class A (NDVAX) is 4.23%, while Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that NDVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDVAXVSMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

4.80%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

11.86%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.63%

18.42%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.04%

21.97%

-1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

24.15%

-2.27%

NDVAX vs. VSMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDVAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDVAX vs. VSMVX - Dividend Comparison

NDVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.47%, more than VSMVX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NDVAX
MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class A
9.47%10.62%6.38%6.06%8.07%9.19%3.82%4.60%7.86%5.16%4.29%3.15%
VSMVX
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.61%1.45%1.85%1.92%1.88%1.66%1.46%1.65%1.89%1.55%1.26%1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, NDVAX and VSMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VSMVX has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to NDVAX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDVAX dropped -44.06% vs VSMVX's -47.61%.

VSMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDVAX and VSMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer