NDQ.AX vs. WRD
NDQ.AX (BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while WRD (WeRide Inc) is a stock. Over the past year, NDQ.AX returned 28.25% vs -27.75% for WRD. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NDQ.AX vs. WRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NDQ.AX is traded in AUD, while WRD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WRD values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDQ.AX achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly higher than WRD's -21.59% return.
NDQ.AX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 10.02%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 28.25%
- 3Y*
- 25.30%
- 5Y*
- 19.70%
- 10Y*
- 21.80%
WRD
- 1D
- -8.65%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- -21.59%
- 6M
- -27.98%
- 1Y
- -27.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NDQ.AX vs. WRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NDQ.AX BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF | 12.48% | 12.19% | 11.81% |
WRD WeRide Inc | -21.59% | -43.23% | -8.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between NDQ.AX and WRD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2024 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NDQ.AX vs. WRD — Risk / Return Rank
NDQ.AX
WRD
NDQ.AX vs. WRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and WeRide Inc (WRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NDQ.AX | WRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.96 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | -0.52 | +2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.77 | -0.90 | +5.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NDQ.AX | WRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | -0.45 | +2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | -0.37 | +1.43 |
Drawdowns
NDQ.AX vs. WRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDQ.AX drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, smaller than the maximum WRD drawdown of -86.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDQ.AX and WRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDQ.AX | WRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -86.18% | +55.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -53.25% | +38.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -83.97% | +83.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -67.28% | +61.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.89% | 31.04% | -25.15% |
Volatility
NDQ.AX vs. WRD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) is 2.85%, while WeRide Inc (WRD) has a volatility of 15.99%. This indicates that NDQ.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NDQ.AX | WRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 15.99% | -13.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 39.29% | -29.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.07% | 62.28% | -48.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 117.51% | -98.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 117.51% | -98.37% |
Dividends
NDQ.AX vs. WRD - Dividend Comparison
NDQ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while WRD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDQ.AX BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 2.17% | 3.36% | 3.33% | 2.47% | 2.22% | 0.52% | 0.45% | 0.43% |
WRD WeRide Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NDQ.AX and WRD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NDQ.AX and WRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer