PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NDQ.AX vs. UMAX.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NDQ.AX vs. UMAX.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

NDQ.AX (BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF) and UMAX.AX (Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NDQ.AX is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while UMAX.AX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by BetaShares. NDQ.AX is passively managed, while UMAX.AX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, NDQ.AX returned 21.14%/yr vs 9.53%/yr for UMAX.AX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

NDQ.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDQ.AX achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly higher than UMAX.AX's -0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, NDQ.AX has outperformed UMAX.AX with an annualized return of 21.14%, while UMAX.AX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.53% annualized return.

NDQ.AX

1D
-3.03%
1M
-4.37%
6M
6.95%
YTD
7.77%
1Y
15.67%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
21.14%

UMAX.AX

1D
-1.20%
1M
0.97%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
-0.54%
1Y
6.66%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDQ.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF		7.77%11.35%38.19%53.22%-28.42%35.46%34.50%39.66%8.97%21.59%
UMAX.AX
Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF		-0.54%4.00%31.81%15.37%-9.29%29.75%-6.67%22.95%2.49%5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NDQ.AX and UMAX.AX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2015

0.76

The correlation between NDQ.AX and UMAX.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF

Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF

Often compared with NDQ.AX:
NDQ.AX vs. IVVNDQ.AX vs. QQQNDQ.AX vs. IOONDQ.AX vs. BTC-USDNDQ.AX vs. SCHGNDQ.AX vs. TQQQNDQ.AX vs. IYW
Often compared with UMAX.AX:
UMAX.AX vs. CORE.AXUMAX.AX vs. F100.AXUMAX.AX vs. FOOD.AXUMAX.AX vs. GEAR.AXUMAX.AX vs. IHOO.AXUMAX.AX vs. SEMI.AXUMAX.AX vs. VDCO.AX

Return for Risk

NDQ.AX vs. UMAX.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NDQ.AX
NDQ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX
UMAX.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
UMAX.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDQ.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) and Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

NDQ.AXUMAX.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.99
0.65

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.40
0.94

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.12

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

0.58

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

1.35

+1.18

NDQ.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the UMAX.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDQ.AX and UMAX.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDQ.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDQ.AX drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, which is greater than UMAX.AX's maximum drawdown of -24.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDQ.AX and UMAX.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NDQ.AXUMAX.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.79%

-24.10%

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.17%

-11.14%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.27%

-15.42%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.79%

-17.14%

-13.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.79%

-24.10%

-6.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.54%

-1.61%

-4.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-5.15%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.10%

4.86%

+1.24%

Volatility

NDQ.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Volatility Comparison

BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX) at 3.05%. This indicates that NDQ.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMAX.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NDQ.AXUMAX.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

3.05%

+3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

7.92%

+4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

9.94%

+5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.19%

12.93%

+6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.17%

13.42%

+5.75%

Dividends

NDQ.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Dividend Comparison

NDQ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than UMAX.AX's 3.16% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF		1.52%0.93%1.81%2.09%3.36%3.33%2.47%2.22%0.37%0.25%0.40%0.00%
UMAX.AX
Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF		3.16%5.33%2.19%4.02%5.79%5.05%7.02%5.43%4.06%3.16%4.12%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

NDQ.AX and UMAX.AX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NDQ.AX is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while UMAX.AX is Global Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDQ.AX and UMAX.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer