PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDMAX vs. NWMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDMAX vs. NWMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) and Nationwide Destination 2040 Fund (NWMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDMAX achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly higher than NWMSX's 9.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NDMAX having a 9.11% annualized return and NWMSX not far behind at 8.79%.


NDMAX

1D
0.19%
1M
4.31%
YTD
10.65%
6M
11.68%
1Y
24.02%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
9.11%

NWMSX

1D
0.10%
1M
4.37%
YTD
9.77%
6M
10.55%
1Y
23.03%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDMAX vs. NWMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDMAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund
10.65%15.92%12.14%18.16%-17.78%14.69%12.86%19.67%-8.68%15.70%
NWMSX
Nationwide Destination 2040 Fund
9.77%17.51%11.63%18.59%-18.29%15.03%13.50%19.70%-8.44%10.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NDMAX and NWMSX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.99

The correlation between NDMAX and NWMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDMAX vs. NWMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDMAX
NDMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NDMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NDMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

NWMSX
NWMSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NWMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NWMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDMAX vs. NWMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) and Nationwide Destination 2040 Fund (NWMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NDMAXNWMSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

2.33

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.41

3.33

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.43

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.02

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.58

13.48

+0.11

NDMAX vs. NWMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the NWMSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDMAX and NWMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NDMAXNWMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.33

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.56

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.58

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.36

+0.03

Drawdowns

NDMAX vs. NWMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDMAX drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, smaller than the maximum NWMSX drawdown of -55.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDMAX and NWMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDMAXNWMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.85%

-55.33%

+7.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-7.75%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.33%

-12.62%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

-30.39%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.00%

-32.80%

-0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-9.31%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.73%

+0.07%

Volatility

NDMAX vs. NWMSX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) and Nationwide Destination 2040 Fund (NWMSX) have volatilities of 3.23% and 3.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDMAXNWMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

3.10%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.31%

8.05%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.25%

10.05%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.65%

14.24%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.48%

15.17%

-0.69%

NDMAX vs. NWMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDMAX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than NWMSX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDMAX vs. NWMSX - Dividend Comparison

NDMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.43%, more than NWMSX's 7.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NDMAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund
8.43%9.28%16.19%6.30%3.88%5.83%5.68%8.26%14.63%10.61%8.26%7.82%
NWMSX
Nationwide Destination 2040 Fund
7.95%8.66%14.65%6.81%2.49%9.45%6.28%7.29%11.84%1.98%8.03%5.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, NDMAX and NWMSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NDMAX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to NWMSX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDMAX dropped -47.85% vs NWMSX's -55.33%.

NDMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDMAX and NWMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer