PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDMAX vs. NADCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDMAX vs. NADCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund (NADCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDMAX achieves a 8.88% return, which is significantly higher than NADCX's 4.85% return. Over the past 10 years, NDMAX has outperformed NADCX with an annualized return of 9.27%, while NADCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.42% annualized return.


NDMAX

1D
-1.69%
1M
0.19%
YTD
8.88%
6M
8.10%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
9.27%

NADCX

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.29%
YTD
4.85%
6M
4.40%
1Y
12.11%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
5.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDMAX vs. NADCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDMAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund
8.88%15.92%12.14%18.16%-17.78%14.69%12.86%19.67%-8.68%15.70%
NADCX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund
4.85%10.98%6.76%11.80%-14.20%7.63%9.77%12.53%-4.34%8.37%

Correlation

The correlation between NDMAX and NADCX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2000

0.97

The correlation between NDMAX and NADCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDMAX vs. NADCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDMAX
NDMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NDMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NDMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

NADCX
NADCX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NADCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NADCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NADCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
NADCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
NADCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDMAX vs. NADCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund (NADCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NDMAXNADCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.36

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.47

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

10.85

+0.79

NDMAX vs. NADCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the NADCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDMAX and NADCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDMAX vs. NADCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDMAX drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, which is greater than NADCX's maximum drawdown of -24.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDMAX and NADCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDMAXNADCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.85%

-24.64%

-23.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-5.21%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.33%

-6.93%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

-20.23%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.00%

-20.23%

-12.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-1.15%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-3.34%

-4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.18%

+0.65%

Volatility

NDMAX vs. NADCX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund (NADCX) at 2.82%. This indicates that NDMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NADCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDMAXNADCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

2.82%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

5.85%

+3.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

6.84%

+4.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

8.03%

+5.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.46%

7.89%

+6.57%

NDMAX vs. NADCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDMAX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than NADCX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDMAX vs. NADCX - Dividend Comparison

NDMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.38%, more than NADCX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NADCX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund
4.21%4.76%9.54%4.85%2.89%3.22%4.17%3.27%8.13%4.95%4.58%4.39%
NDMAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund
8.38%9.28%16.19%6.30%3.88%5.83%5.68%8.26%14.63%10.61%8.26%7.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, NDMAX and NADCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NDMAX has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to NADCX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDMAX dropped -47.85% vs NADCX's -24.64%.

NDMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDMAX and NADCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer