NDIV vs. USNG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NDIV (Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF) and USNG (Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds from Amplify. NDIV is passively managed, while USNG is actively managed. Over the past year, NDIV returned 25.70% vs 47.43% for USNG. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.

Performance

NDIV vs. USNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDIV achieves a 27.13% return, which is significantly lower than USNG's 36.17% return.

NDIV

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -6.94%
• YTD: 27.13%
• 6M: 28.26%
• 1Y: 25.70%
• 3Y*: 17.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USNG

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: 36.17%
• 6M: 36.35%
• 1Y: 47.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDIV vs. USNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF	27.13%	1.01%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	36.17%	10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between NDIV and USNG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2025	0.42

NDIV vs. USNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NDIV	USNG
Energy	80.0%	79.2%
Basic Materials	19.0%	1.4%
Financial Services	0.7%	1.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	12.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	4.7%

Return for Risk

NDIV vs. USNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDIV

NDIV Risk / Return Rank: 39
NDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
NDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
NDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 34
NDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
NDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 37

USNG

USNG Risk / Return Rank: 91
USNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
USNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
USNG Omega Ratio Rank: 86
USNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
USNG Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDIV vs. USNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NDIV	USNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	2.86	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	3.85	-2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.48	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	6.99	-4.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.45	21.05	-15.60

NDIV vs. USNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the USNG Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDIV and USNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NDIV vs. USNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDIV drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than USNG's maximum drawdown of -6.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIV and USNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDIV	USNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.73%	-6.82%	-12.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.73%	-6.82%	-3.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.07%	-0.64%	-7.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-1.52%	-2.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.73%	2.26%	+2.47%

Volatility

NDIV vs. USNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) is 5.97%, while Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that NDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NDIV	USNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.97%	6.29%	-0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.53%	12.47%	+1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.18%	16.68%	+3.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.94%	16.61%	+4.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.94%	16.61%	+4.33%

NDIV vs. USNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NDIV and USNG have an expense ratio of 0.59%.

Dividends

NDIV vs. USNG - Dividend Comparison

NDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, more than USNG's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF	6.81%	5.64%	5.88%	7.37%	1.69%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	1.09%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDIV and USNG in my portfolio?

NDIV and USNG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NDIV or USNG?

USNG has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to NDIV (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDIV dropped -19.73% vs USNG's -6.82%.

Which ETF is better, NDIV or USNG?

On 1-year performance, USNG leads with 47.43% vs 25.70% for NDIV. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, NDIV has been the lower-risk option at 5.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NDIV or USNG?

Over the 1-year period, USNG has performed better with a 47.43% return vs 25.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NDIV or USNG?

NDIV and USNG have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NDIV or USNG?

NDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.81%, compared with 1.09% for USNG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.