NDIV vs. INFR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NDIV (Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF) and INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - NDIV tracks the EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index while INFR tracks the RARE Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NDIV returned 18.96%/yr vs 5.55%/yr for INFR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.

Performance

NDIV vs. INFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDIV achieves a 32.65% return, which is significantly higher than INFR's 1.41% return.

NDIV

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -2.94%
• YTD: 32.65%
• 6M: 28.18%
• 1Y: 34.21%
• 3Y*: 18.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INFR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 7.79%
• 3Y*: 5.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDIV vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF	32.65%	2.85%	6.18%	15.52%	3.09%
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.41%	24.00%	-6.23%	5.20%	-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NDIV and INFR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2022	0.32

The correlation between NDIV and INFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NDIV vs. INFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NDIV	INFR
Energy	81.7%	-
Basic Materials	18.2%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	27.5%
Real Estate	-	4.1%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	68.5%

Return for Risk

NDIV vs. INFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDIV

NDIV Risk / Return Rank: 50
NDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
NDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
NDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 46
NDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
NDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 46

INFR

INFR Risk / Return Rank: 27
INFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
INFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
INFR Omega Ratio Rank: 31
INFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
INFR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDIV vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NDIV	INFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	0.93	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	1.36	+0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.21	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	1.28	+1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.55	3.97	+3.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NDIV vs. INFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the INFR Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDIV and INFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NDIV	INFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	0.93	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.46	+0.27

Drawdowns

NDIV vs. INFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDIV drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, roughly equal to the maximum INFR drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIV and INFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDIV	INFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.73%	-19.28%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.73%	-6.43%	-4.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.73%	-18.55%	-1.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.08%	-0.70%	-3.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-4.93%	+0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.55%	2.04%	+2.51%

Volatility

NDIV vs. INFR - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) at 0.00%. This indicates that NDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NDIV	INFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	0.00%	+4.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.38%	3.79%	+9.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.04%	9.00%	+11.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.92%	14.26%	+6.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.92%	14.26%	+6.66%

NDIV vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NDIV and INFR have an expense ratio of 0.59%.

Dividends

NDIV vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison

NDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than INFR's 2.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	2.49%	2.52%	2.36%	3.06%	0.00%
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF	6.53%	5.64%	5.88%	7.37%	1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDIV and INFR in my portfolio?

NDIV and INFR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NDIV or INFR?

NDIV has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to INFR (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDIV dropped -19.73% vs INFR's -19.28%.

Which ETF is better, NDIV or INFR?

On 3-year performance, NDIV leads with 18.96% vs 5.55% for INFR. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, INFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NDIV or INFR?

Over the 3-year period, NDIV has performed better with a 18.96% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NDIV or INFR?

NDIV and INFR have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NDIV or INFR?

NDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 2.49% for INFR.

What is the main difference between NDIV and INFR?

NDIV tracks EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index, while INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and ClearBridge.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.