PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDIV vs. GXPE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDIV vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NDIV having a 33.67% return and GXPE slightly higher at 34.48%.


NDIV

1D
1.10%
1M
8.05%
6M
18.09%
YTD
33.67%
1Y
33.78%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.64%

GXPE

1D
0.83%
1M
12.27%
6M
17.67%
YTD
34.48%
1Y
42.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
39.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$27.82K$19.84K$23.45K
$359.17K$364.93K$506.10K

NDIV vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NDIV and GXPE is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.78

The correlation between NDIV and GXPE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDIV vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NDIV
NDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

GXPE
GXPE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GXPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXPE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GXPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXPE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NDIV vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NDIVGXPEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.54

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.50

6.75

-0.25

NDIV vs. GXPE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the GXPE Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDIV and GXPE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDIV vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDIV drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIV and GXPE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDIVGXPEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.73%

-15.73%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-15.73%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.34%

-4.53%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-4.28%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

5.93%

-1.24%

Volatility

NDIV vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) is 5.04%, while Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that NDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXPE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDIVGXPEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

5.85%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.65%

16.76%

-3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.52%

20.77%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.88%

20.64%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.88%

20.64%

+0.24%

NDIV vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDIV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDIV vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison

NDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%, more than GXPE's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GXPE
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF
2.07%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NDIV
Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF
7.68%5.64%5.88%7.37%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


NDIV and GXPE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GXPE has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to NDIV (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDIV dropped -19.73% vs GXPE's -15.73%.

On 1-year performance, GXPE leads with 42.07% vs 33.78% for NDIV. On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, NDIV has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GXPE has performed better with a 42.07% return vs 33.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for NDIV.

NDIV has the higher dividend yield at 7.68%, compared with 2.07% for GXPE.

NDIV tracks EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index, while GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for NDIV and 0.15% for GXPE.

GXPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDIV and GXPE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer