NDIV vs. EIPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NDIV (Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF) and EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. NDIV is passively managed, while EIPX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NDIV returned 18.96%/yr vs 21.12%/yr for EIPX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NDIV charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EIPX.

Performance

NDIV vs. EIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDIV achieves a 32.65% return, which is significantly higher than EIPX's 21.96% return.

NDIV

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -2.94%
• YTD: 32.65%
• 6M: 28.18%
• 1Y: 34.21%
• 3Y*: 18.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EIPX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: 21.96%
• 6M: 19.46%
• 1Y: 30.04%
• 3Y*: 21.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDIV vs. EIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF	32.65%	2.85%	6.18%	15.52%	5.47%
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	21.96%	11.44%	19.11%	10.74%	0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between NDIV and EIPX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2022	0.86

The correlation between NDIV and EIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

NDIV vs. EIPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NDIV	EIPX
Energy	81.7%	69.5%
Basic Materials	18.2%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	4.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.2%
Utilities	-	26.1%

Return for Risk

NDIV vs. EIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDIV

NDIV Risk / Return Rank: 50
NDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
NDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
NDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 46
NDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
NDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 46

EIPX

EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 86
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDIV vs. EIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NDIV	EIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.71	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	3.82	-1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.46	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	7.32	-4.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.55	20.31	-12.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NDIV vs. EIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the EIPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDIV and EIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NDIV	EIPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.71	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	1.20	-0.47

Drawdowns

NDIV vs. EIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDIV drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than EIPX's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIV and EIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDIV	EIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.73%	-15.43%	-4.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.73%	-4.12%	-6.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.73%	-15.43%	-4.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.08%	-2.58%	-1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-2.27%	-1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.55%	1.49%	+3.06%

Volatility

NDIV vs. EIPX - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) at 4.01%. This indicates that NDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NDIV	EIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	4.01%	+0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.38%	8.50%	+4.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.04%	11.17%	+8.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.92%	15.06%	+5.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.92%	15.06%	+5.86%

NDIV vs. EIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDIV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

NDIV vs. EIPX - Dividend Comparison

NDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than EIPX's 2.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	2.68%	3.23%	3.27%	3.48%	0.34%
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF	6.53%	5.64%	5.88%	7.37%	1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDIV and EIPX in my portfolio?

NDIV and EIPX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NDIV or EIPX?

NDIV has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to EIPX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDIV dropped -19.73% vs EIPX's -15.43%.

Which ETF is better, NDIV or EIPX?

On 3-year performance, EIPX leads with 21.12% vs 18.96% for NDIV. On fees, NDIV is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EIPX has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NDIV or EIPX?

Over the 3-year period, EIPX has performed better with a 21.12% return vs 18.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NDIV or EIPX?

NDIV is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NDIV or EIPX?

NDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 2.68% for EIPX.

What is the main difference between NDIV and EIPX?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for NDIV and 0.95% for EIPX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.