NDIA vs. VUSA.MI
NDIA (Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF) and VUSA.MI (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NDIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Global X, while VUSA.MI is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. NDIA is actively managed, while VUSA.MI is passively managed. Over the past year, NDIA returned -11.48% vs 24.27% for VUSA.MI. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NDIA charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VUSA.MI.
Performance
NDIA vs. VUSA.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NDIA is traded in USD, while VUSA.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VUSA.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDIA achieves a -11.53% return, which is significantly lower than VUSA.MI's 8.11% return.
NDIA
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- -11.53%
- 6M
- -9.70%
- 1Y
- -11.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUSA.MI
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 8.11%
- 6M
- 9.40%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.19%
- 10Y*
- —
NDIA vs. VUSA.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF | -11.53% | 5.04% | 5.75% | 12.76% |
VUSA.MI Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 8.11% | 17.83% | 25.92% | 8.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between NDIA and VUSA.MI is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2023 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NDIA vs. VUSA.MI — Risk / Return Rank
NDIA
VUSA.MI
NDIA vs. VUSA.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NDIA | VUSA.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.36 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 2.76 | -3.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 11.58 | -13.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NDIA vs. VUSA.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDIA drawdown since its inception was -22.05%, smaller than the maximum VUSA.MI drawdown of -34.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIA and VUSA.MI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDIA | VUSA.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.05% | -34.14% | +12.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.03% | -8.79% | -9.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.96% | -2.34% | -15.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.16% | -4.99% | -2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.58% | 2.10% | +5.48% |
Volatility
NDIA vs. VUSA.MI - Volatility Comparison
Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.MI) at 3.33%. This indicates that NDIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUSA.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NDIA | VUSA.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 3.33% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.65% | 8.40% | +5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.87% | 11.67% | +4.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 15.95% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 17.51% | -1.90% |
NDIA vs. VUSA.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDIA has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSA.MI's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
NDIA vs. VUSA.MI - Dividend Comparison
NDIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than VUSA.MI's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF | 1.24% | 1.10% | 3.66% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUSA.MI Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.88% | 0.97% | 0.99% | 1.26% | 1.45% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NDIA and VUSA.MI have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUSA.MI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUSA.MI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for NDIA.
NDIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VUSA.MI is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for NDIA and 0.07% for VUSA.MI.
Find the right allocation for NDIA and VUSA.MI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer