PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDCAX vs. DGTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDCAX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Investor Destinations Conservative Fund (NDCAX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDCAX achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly lower than DGTSX's 4.30% return. Over the past 10 years, NDCAX has underperformed DGTSX with an annualized return of 3.49%, while DGTSX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.23% annualized return.


NDCAX

1D
0.49%
1M
1.07%
YTD
3.29%
6M
3.40%
1Y
9.19%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*
3.49%

DGTSX

1D
0.34%
1M
0.76%
YTD
4.30%
6M
4.30%
1Y
9.92%
3Y*
8.27%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
5.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDCAX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NDCAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Conservative Fund
3.29%8.40%4.15%8.61%-12.52%3.71%8.22%8.79%-2.16%5.05%
DGTSX
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio
4.30%8.39%7.43%8.93%-8.06%10.20%7.29%9.80%-1.85%5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between NDCAX and DGTSX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2003

0.85

The correlation between NDCAX and DGTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDCAX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDCAX
NDCAX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NDCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NDCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

DGTSX
DGTSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DGTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DGTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDCAX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Investor Destinations Conservative Fund (NDCAX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NDCAXDGTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.57

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

3.79

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.51

16.65

-6.14

NDCAX vs. DGTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the DGTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDCAX and DGTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDCAX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDCAX drawdown since its inception was -17.56%, which is greater than DGTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDCAX and DGTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDCAXDGTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.56%

-16.71%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.90%

-2.64%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.28%

-7.46%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.56%

-11.26%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.56%

-11.26%

-6.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.14%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.93%

-1.64%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.60%

+0.28%

Volatility

NDCAX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Investor Destinations Conservative Fund (NDCAX) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 1.42%. This indicates that NDCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDCAXDGTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

1.42%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.91%

2.98%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.50%

3.59%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.72%

5.98%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

5.24%

-0.26%

NDCAX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDCAX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDCAX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison

NDCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than DGTSX's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGTSX
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio
5.70%5.54%7.28%4.75%2.77%7.62%2.12%2.57%2.99%1.25%1.26%1.50%
NDCAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Conservative Fund
3.06%3.60%5.42%3.42%2.06%3.02%2.98%1.63%5.35%2.27%2.91%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


NDCAX and DGTSX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NDCAX has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to DGTSX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDCAX dropped -17.56% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.

DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDCAX and DGTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer