NDAQ vs. IXC
NDAQ (Nasdaq, Inc.) is a stock, while IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Energy Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, NDAQ returned 16.94%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for IXC. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NDAQ vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDAQ achieves a -8.65% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 32.12% return. Over the past 10 years, NDAQ has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 16.94%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.
NDAQ
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- -8.65%
- 6M
- -1.43%
- 1Y
- 6.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 16.94%
IXC
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 32.12%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- 50.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 19.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
NDAQ vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | -8.65% | 27.19% | 34.85% | -3.66% | -11.19% | 60.13% | 25.99% | 33.88% | 8.21% | 16.76% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 32.12% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between NDAQ and IXC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2002 | 0.32 |
The correlation between NDAQ and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NDAQ vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
NDAQ
IXC
NDAQ vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NDAQ | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.44 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 5.24 | -4.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | 15.73 | -15.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NDAQ | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 2.71 | -2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.84 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.38 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.32 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
NDAQ vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDAQ drawdown since its inception was -68.48%, roughly equal to the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDAQ and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDAQ | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.48% | -67.88% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.76% | -9.66% | -12.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.76% | -19.06% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.84% | -24.93% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.31% | -64.16% | +25.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.13% | -4.91% | -7.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.82% | -17.48% | -6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.28% | 3.21% | +6.07% |
Volatility
NDAQ vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) have volatilities of 7.19% and 7.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NDAQ | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 7.50% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.70% | 15.38% | +5.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.50% | 18.73% | +5.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 23.50% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.25% | 26.85% | -2.60% |
Dividends
NDAQ vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
NDAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than IXC's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.79% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | 1.22% | 1.08% | 1.22% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.00% | 1.46% | 1.73% | 2.08% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NDAQ and IXC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to NDAQ (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDAQ dropped -68.48% vs IXC's -67.88%.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NDAQ and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer