NCZ vs. VKSIX
NCZ (Virtus Convertible and Income Fund II) and VKSIX (Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Core Fund) are both mutual funds - NCZ is a Convertible Bonds fund managed by Virtus, while VKSIX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus. Over the past 5 years, NCZ returned 5.27%/yr vs -0.39%/yr for VKSIX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NCZ charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for VKSIX.
Performance
NCZ vs. VKSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCZ achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly higher than VKSIX's -7.39% return.
NCZ
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 6M
- 16.91%
- 1Y
- 40.02%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
VKSIX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -7.39%
- 6M
- -8.94%
- 1Y
- -10.32%
- 3Y*
- 2.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.39%
- 10Y*
- —
NCZ vs. VKSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCZ Virtus Convertible and Income Fund II | 18.78% | 23.23% | 18.40% | 17.75% | -35.93% | 9.24% | 11.04% | 27.19% | -18.82% |
VKSIX Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Core Fund | -7.39% | -4.36% | 9.07% | 23.61% | -23.83% | 19.54% | 33.45% | 38.81% | -6.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between NCZ and VKSIX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NCZ and VKSIX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NCZ vs. VKSIX — Risk / Return Rank
NCZ
VKSIX
NCZ vs. VKSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Convertible and Income Fund II (NCZ) and Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Core Fund (VKSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NCZ | VKSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.92 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | -0.55 | +3.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.83 | -1.09 | +15.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NCZ vs. VKSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCZ drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, which is greater than VKSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCZ and VKSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCZ | VKSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.48% | -35.59% | -43.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -16.70% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.54% | -20.29% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.93% | -32.49% | -11.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | -18.34% | +16.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.32% | -8.92% | -5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 8.41% | -5.70% |
Volatility
NCZ vs. VKSIX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Convertible and Income Fund II (NCZ) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Core Fund (VKSIX) at 4.36%. This indicates that NCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VKSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NCZ | VKSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 4.36% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 12.11% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.73% | 15.84% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 19.23% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.29% | 20.95% | +3.34% |
NCZ vs. VKSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCZ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VKSIX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
NCZ vs. VKSIX - Dividend Comparison
NCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.24%, more than VKSIX's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCZ Virtus Convertible and Income Fund II | 9.24% | 10.45% | 11.50% | 12.84% | 15.62% | 8.82% | 9.28% | 11.28% | 15.33% | 13.80% | 12.08% | 18.02% |
VKSIX Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Core Fund | 0.37% | 0.34% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.13% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NCZ and VKSIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NCZ has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to VKSIX (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCZ dropped -79.48% vs VKSIX's -35.59%.
NCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NCZ and VKSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer